I dislocated the little finger on my left hand stopping a pen. Bend it totally the opposite way it supposed to be! That was about 1993 and it's still mis-shapen today! Mind you, the pen taker was the Midlands Kick Boxing Champion and a vicious loan shark!I used to love pens, I could kick it harder than the other kids so used to just give it the foot through it approach and they would move out it's way.
Used to play a lot of five-a-side and all of us players could lash the ball in from any angle. It taught you to strike quickly and importantly, with small goals, put the ball where the goalie wasn't. Amazed how many professional footballers hit the ball at the keeper with a full size gaping goal.
I think strikers are being asked to do too much defensive work.
In my view they should be specialists in scoring goals and not much else.
But our strikers are probably following Robins' instructions.
There are so many things that go to making a successful team, it would fill a book.
The problem is CCFC's book has half the pages missing.
Some good points there. If your strikers are firing blanks, other players should chip in and net a few.As long as the team are under the understanding that a particular player is just in the team to score goals and the others will have to make up the slack. Then that striker (I don''t think you could put two on just to score goals - it'd leave too much for everyone else and the egos would make it unworkable) knows he has to score when a chance comes along to keep his place.
It also depends on how creative you are at making chances too. If you don't create much then you're essentially playing a player short because one isn't doing anything.
What's your opinion on midfielders/defenders 'chipping in'? Do you think they should be doing that or it's not their job and they're specialists at something else? Should defenders be asked to be comfortable on the ball and pass it around, or should their sole job be to keep the ball out of their net and as long as they do that they're fine?
I'm not saying strikers should do nothing other than hang around the opponents goal waiting for a tap-in. But they shouldn't have to run back when the opposition have possession and wear themselves out and they shouldn't have to defend corners. There wouldn't be much extra 'slack' because with a couple of strikers up front, the opposition dare not commit so many men forward and with a hard-tacking midfield they can always lose possesion. I believe football is a simple game which has become over complex. The defenders job is to get the ball to the midfielders and their job is to get it to the strikers, the strikers job is to score. Everyone performs best when they are doing what they are best at. Of course, that's an oversimplification. The details depend on the system and tactics the manager decides on and the players at his disposal.As long as the team are under the understanding that a particular player is just in the team to score goals and the others will have to make up the slack. Then that striker (I don''t think you could put two on just to score goals - it'd leave too much for everyone else and the egos would make it unworkable) knows he has to score when a chance comes along to keep his place.
It also depends on how creative you are at making chances too. If you don't create much then you're essentially playing a player short because one isn't doing anything.
What's your opinion on midfielders/defenders 'chipping in'? Do you think they should be doing that or it's not their job and they're specialists at something else? Should defenders be asked to be comfortable on the ball and pass it around, or should their sole job be to keep the ball out of their net and as long as they do that they're fine?
If you think back to the late eighties/ early 90’s most team played 442 often with a big man an little man upfront, and often it was the little man who scored most the goals. Players like lineker , cottee, Quinn, were all about living in the box and finishing- most of their goals were sliding in falling over just doing whatever it took to get the ball in the net.
Most teams now play 1upfront but it’s the big man, build up play man who survived not the goal hanging lad. Was watching Newport v Middlesbrough the other night Middlesbrough bought a couple a big lads on and I watching them thinking why do they play at a higher than scorers from lower leagues/ just watching them you can tell they aren’t goal scorers even in league 1-2 they’d wouldn’t score 20goals a season
I am for goal scores like billy sharp, hes not trying to look cool, do anything fancy he just wants to score goals.
Ferguson and Wallace - our top scoring side in the top flight. Always a massive roar went up when we won a corner, flick ons, knock downs, spilled crosses - meat and drink to the dynamic duo.If you think back to the late eighties/ early 90’s most team played 442 often with a big man an little man upfront, and often it was the little man who scored most the goals. Players like lineker , cottee, Quinn, were all about living in the box and finishing- most of their goals were sliding in falling over just doing whatever it took to get the ball in the net.
Most teams now play 1upfront but it’s the big man, build up play man who survived not the goal hanging lad. Was watching Newport v Middlesbrough the other night Middlesbrough bought a couple a big lads on and I watching them thinking why do they play at a higher than scorers from lower leagues/ just watching them you can tell they aren’t goal scorers even in league 1-2 they’d wouldn’t score 20goals a season
I am for goal scores like billy sharp, hes not trying to look cool, do anything fancy he just wants to score goals.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?