Sky Sports Transfer talk about a £20m “package” this will probably mean staged payments based on goals, appearances etc. will that mean we will also have trickled payments?
Bournemouth were reported to be keen on Matt Ritchie being part of the deal so we will have to see if it is £20million cash plus Ritchie what would the value of Ritchie be ?Sky Sports Transfer talk about a £20m “package” this will probably mean staged payments based on goals, appearances etc. will that mean we will also have trickled payments?
Bournemouth were reported to be keen on Matt Ritchie being part of the deal so we will have to see if it is £20million cash plus Ritchie what would the value of Ritchie be ?
Read somewhere that Matt Ritchie is on 60m + a week and has time on his contract. Would he move?
££££££££££££££££££££££££
Read somewhere that Matt Ritchie is on 60m + a week and has time on his contract. Would he move?
Oops I meant kEven Lionel Ritchie doesn't earn that
Even Lionel Ritchie doesn't earn that
£2.55m incoming then. Hope it gives Robins the cash to get one of his other targets in. Very curious as to what position he’s looking at.
FFS I should give up this morning
It’s the same business model as the one we have now and we got fees for both Fox and Dann.I think problems have come up when players like Scott Dann, Dan Fox, Kieran Westwood proved themselves but weren’t tied down on longer contracts and essentially all left at similar times for free. That was terrible business
I agree if you could get Walsh then get him but this is the strongest squad we’ve started a season with in a long time. I don’t want us to pay good money for someone to sit on the bench. Was it Robins that said in League Two time that you can only spend your pound once. Injuries and lack of form will come in midway through the window and we can improve then.Why not be stronger for the whole season rather than half of it - #FreeWalsh
I don’t get the argument that this means we can bring a few more players in. If we have a target that we know will improve the squad then go get them but we don’t need a lot of bodies in now. I’d keep the money in the club and use it in January if we need to.
I don’t get the argument that this means we can bring a few more players in. If we have a target that we know will improve the squad then go get them but we don’t need a lot of bodies in now. I’d keep the money in the club and use it in January if we need to.
It’s not accurate - a whole football teams wages aren’t in the public domainIf that wages website was to be believed we've saved 5k a week wages on hiwula. Throw in some Wilson money and we could look for Walsh. However perhaps some of this will be used for tools for stadium planning?
It’s the same business model as the one we have now and we got fees for both Fox and Dann.
We signed Westwood on a 3 year contract and he repeatably turned down a new contract and left for a PL club at the time.
I have a different recollection to you. I seem to remember we only got round to offering Westwood a new deal in the final January of his contract. Pretty sure the same happened with Gunnarsson too.
It will have nothing to do with it. Fraser is also in talks and out of the two Newcastle are more likely to do wellI love villa fans moaning saying the reason he picked Newcastle is due to him bring a cov fan
He’s a cov lad his mum drinks down the Radford club I thought he would of ended up closer to home at villaI don’t think he’s a fan anyway, would like to see us do well but that’s it
With only 12 months left on the contract it’s always a risk a good player will wait it out to go on a free and get a better deal on wages. We should’ve done it after the first season or 18 months point, we all knew he was good at that point
I have a different recollection to you. I seem to remember we only got round to offering Westwood a new deal in the final January of his contract. Pretty sure the same happened with Gunnarsson too.
At the risk of repetition, a club in our financial situation, that is rising quite successfully, and turning over players quite frequently (this year's likely line up could have up to 4-5 newcomers) ....does not need to be encumbered with long term contracts in the vague hope there will be a sell on. The guys to lock in are the promising youngsters like Bapaga.On the other hand we signed players like David Bell on a 4 year deal, it works both ways
At the risk of repetition, a club in our financial situation, that is rising quite successfully, and turning over players quite frequently (this year's likely line up could have up to 4-5 newcomers) ....does not need to be encumbered with long term contracts in the vague hope there will be a sell on. The guys to lock in are the promising youngsters like Bapaga.
Biamou is a case in point. How much better if we had been able just to release him and say thank you.
I don’t think he’s a fan anyway, would like to see us do well but that’s it
He'd do that.Even Lionel Ritchie doesn't earn that
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?