D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
This use kicking off? You said he'd been itching for a chance to drop Wilson for Collins since signing him, which is an odd way of saying he might be dropped for having a poor game.
This use kicking off? You said he'd been itching for a chance to drop Wilson for Collins since signing him, which is an odd way of saying he might be dropped for having a poor game.Thats literally what im saying. He will be dropped for Collins after his shit showing Tuesday. Soon as Wilson put in a shit performance he was going to be dropped. We all know that, why are you kicking off about it ?
This use kicking off? You said he'd been itching for a chance to drop Wilson for Collins since signing him, which is an odd way of saying he might be dropped for having a poor game.
It isn't the first chance he's had.He has been. Why did he drop 3 quarters of a million on someone to be a 'back up'
First chance he can get Robins will have Collins in goal. That will be Monday
What's he got against Wilson?
It isn't the first chance he's had.
I sense that Robins fell into a trap that I have done as an FM veteran which is to try to spend every penny of the budget in a given window just because it's there. Although in my defence Doug King gave me £16 million despite making the Champions League whereas MR has been given more than that to make Cardiff look invincible.Should have saved the £13m on Wright, Collins and Kitching, bought in at £2m a piece GK, CB, CM x 2 ST x 2 then spent £1m on bringing back any shit players who were great in the dressing room.
The fact we’ve spent so much yet have had to resort to Kelly being in the starting 11 suggests it hasn’t exactly been spent wisely.I sense that Robins fell into a trap that I have done as an FM veteran which is to try to spend every penny of the budget in a given window just because it's there. Although in my defence Doug King gave me £16 million despite making the Champions League whereas MR has been given more than that to make Cardiff look invincible.
Given your player ratings I see this as a big positive for CollinsWasn't impressed by Collins pre-season and v Wimbledon but haven't been impressed by Wilson this season either. Both gave me heart in the mouth moments.
I agree. Didn’t think collins looked very confident from what I’ve seen from him so far. Stick with Wilson.Wasn't impressed by Collins pre-season and v Wimbledon but haven't been impressed by Wilson this season either. Both gave me heart in the mouth moments.
Steve is usually spot on and Collins did look a little shaky Vs exeter did he not?Given your player ratings I see this as a big positive for Collins
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
He's surprised me and done a half decent job to be fair, but you are 100% right.The fact we’ve spent so much yet have had to resort to Kelly being in the starting 11 suggests it hasn’t exactly been spent wisely.
It also stuns me to see people writing off decent free agents just because they’re free agents and would provide more depth in ability. Look at our fixture pile up in December when pitches get heavier and conditions get worse.The fact we’ve spent so much yet have had to resort to Kelly being in the starting 11 suggests it hasn’t exactly been spent wisely.
Nothing wrong with free agents but I imagine people like Cannon will want guarantees of first team football that we can’t give beyond MVE’s injury.It also stuns me to see people writing off decent free agents just because they’re free agents and would provide more depth in ability. Look at our fixture pile up in December when pitches get heavier and conditions get worse.
We need more bodies in at midfield and now right back.
He’ll have it for at least 6 months most likely in that case. Beyond that he’d still get regular time just probably not starting. Guess we’ll see him next Saturday anywayNothing wrong with free agents but I imagine people like Cannon will want guarantees of first team football that we can’t give beyond MVE’s injury.
Based on what?If he even thinks about dropping Wilson it’s a disgrace, how anyone can even think he should is beyond me.
Based on he won the golden glove last year and we should be loyal to him and he’s a character a squad needs you muppet.Based on what?
If he was wholly responsible for winning the golden glove, by that same logic he’s responsible for the goals being shipped in this season.Based on he won the golden glove last year and we should be loyal to him and he’s a character a squad needs you muppet.
Wouldn’t want to be in the trenches with youIf he was wholly responsible for winning the golden glove, by that same logic he’s responsible for the goals being shipped in this season.
Err ok.Wouldn’t want to be in the trenches with you
I don't really understand xG but isn't that the 2nd best? If Leicester and Preston are up there (1st and 3rd in the table), surely it's a positive measurement, no?!If you believe in xG then we’re joint second lowest against in the league which doesn’t reflect well on the goalkeeper/defence
Yes but our goals conceded isn’t the second best in the league, means we’ve conceded a lot of “low quality” goals which by a statistical model shouldn’t be going inI don't really understand xG but isn't that the 2nd best? If Leicester and Preston are up there (1st and 3rd in the table), surely it's a positive measurement, no?!
I don't really understand xG but isn't that the 2nd best? If Leicester and Preston are up there (1st and 3rd in the table), surely it's a positive measurement, no?!
Not really because Leicester and Preston have conceded 5 and 6 respectively, whereas we've conceded 10. It suggests that there is a very good xG to goal conversion rate, so that might be due to the keeper.I don't really understand xG but isn't that the 2nd best? If Leicester and Preston are up there (1st and 3rd in the table), surely it's a positive measurement, no?!
Wilson only got in the team because there was no loyalty shown to Moore after allBased on he won the golden glove last year and we should be loyal to him and he’s a character a squad needs you muppet.
The fact we’ve spent so much yet have had to resort to Kelly being in the starting 11 suggests it hasn’t exactly been spent wisely.
He’s ok as a last resort squad player but really shouldn’t starting considering how much has been reinvested back into the squad.I think Kelly is a decent player.
The problem - which is hardly his fault - is that he isn't a Harmer replacement, which some expect him to be, although to be fair few are.
The nearest we currently have to replacing Harmer are Palmer - who I still rate despite a couple of poor performances since returning from international duty - and Ayari, who is promising but young and not yet settled into the team.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?