Otis
Well-Known Member
Suggested it before and will say so again, wouldn't it be a good idea to try wing backs?
Both Christie and Adams are pretty good at getting forwards, but our defence looks ropey. Half the time Christie and Adams are caught out going forwards anyway with the way we play, so why not go for 3 at the back and play wing backs?
We could go for
--------------- Murphy ------
------- Wood Cameron Edge
Christie ---------------------- Adams
Baker Jennings/Bailey Mouss/Fleck Sheff
--------------- Clarke/ Elliot
With 3 at the back that will give us a bit more protection for the marauding fullbacks. To me they are almost playing like wing backs anyway. Just think 3 at the back might make us a bit more solid when teams counter attack us.
Not saying it will necessarily work, just saying it might be worth a try.
Both Christie and Adams are pretty good at getting forwards, but our defence looks ropey. Half the time Christie and Adams are caught out going forwards anyway with the way we play, so why not go for 3 at the back and play wing backs?
We could go for
--------------- Murphy ------
------- Wood Cameron Edge
Christie ---------------------- Adams
Baker Jennings/Bailey Mouss/Fleck Sheff
--------------- Clarke/ Elliot
With 3 at the back that will give us a bit more protection for the marauding fullbacks. To me they are almost playing like wing backs anyway. Just think 3 at the back might make us a bit more solid when teams counter attack us.
Not saying it will necessarily work, just saying it might be worth a try.