Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Most child sexual abuse gangs made up of white men, Home Office report says
Study of England, Scotland and Wales dispels myth of ‘Asian grooming gangs’ popularised by far right
Doesn't surprise me in the slightestMost child sexual abuse gangs made up of white men, Home Office report says
Study of England, Scotland and Wales dispels myth of ‘Asian grooming gangs’ popularised by far rightwww.google.co.uk
This! So much better than cheap point scoring for any agenda.To be honest it shouldn't matter whether they're white, Brown, Black or whatever.
The police should pursue them aggressively and the courts should come down on them like a ton of bricks - vermin
There’s an entire political movement based on the cheap point scoring.... you know the ones saying we’re all trapped under Muslamic law.This! So much better than cheap point scoring for any agenda.
And as if by magic, Ian appears with a political twist. Hopefully see you on the Huddersfield thread tomorrow (that's Coventry v Huddersfield in association football in case you'd forgotten whilst this place existedThere’s an entire political movement based on the cheap point scoring.... you know the ones saying we’re all trapped under Muslamic law.
And as if by magic you conveniently forgot your opening 3 point salvo.And as if by magic, Ian appears with a political twist. Hopefully see you on the Huddersfield thread tomorrow (that's Coventry v Huddersfield in association football in case you'd forgotten whilst this place existed)
Not sure how addressing someone by their real name rather than their made up name can be described as childish. I stopped calling my mates by the made names we called each other at school around the time I reached adulthood. Pretty standard behaviour in the adult world.1) showing one set of cunts to be in greater number than another set of cunts is not an endorsement. Cunts are cunts whatever their background.
2) It's the Guardian so I'm not surprised to read that
3) we all know Robinsons real name, but I do find it strange that so many find the way to try and take the high ground is to use his real name. Criticise what he stands for by all means, otherwise it simply smacks of childlike desperation to constantly use it.
Is it on ifollow too? Thought we had to watch through sky if it was on there. As much as Clive and Oggy are annoying I'd prefer them over probably Lee Hendrie or someone.And as if by magic you conveniently forgot your opening 3 point salvo.
You may see me, or I may just concentrate on watching the game that I’ve subscribed to - unless of course it’s mandatory to justify where and how I choose to post and use this site
I'll suspect you're inconsistent with that, particularly on celebs and only reserve it for ones you take a dislike to, but I'll give you the benefit of doubtNot sure how addressing someone by their real name rather than their made up name can be described as childish. I stopped calling my mates by the made names we called each other at school around the time I reached adulthood. Pretty standard behaviour in the adult world.
Sky only works I believe when it’s Champions League nights I think...Is it on ifollow too? Thought we had to watch through sky if it was on there. As much as Clive and Oggy are annoying I'd prefer them over probably Lee Hendrie or someone.
I think you mean Sharia Labeouf lawThere’s an entire political movement based on the cheap point scoring.... you know the ones saying we’re all trapped under Muslamic law.
I thought we were actually on sky tomorrow though so I was more concerned if we'd have ifollow than sky.Sky only works I believe when it’s Champions League nights I think...
That’s a bonus then. So there appears to be no logic to when Sky give us the red button option.I thought we were actually on sky tomorrow though so I was more concerned if we'd have ifollow than sky.
That’s a bonus then. So there appears to be no logic to when Sky give us the red button option.
I'll suspect you're inconsistent with that, particularly on celebs and only reserve it for ones you take a dislike to, but I'll give you the benefit of doubt
Most child sexual abuse gangs made up of white men, Home Office report says
Study of England, Scotland and Wales dispels myth of ‘Asian grooming gangs’ popularised by far rightwww.google.co.uk
Forum motto?Nonces are nonces regardless of colour.
Looking back when I was at school, you always had the girls getting picked up in cars who were going out with "older lads". Looking back now, it is a bit random why a 19-20 year old would want to go out with a 15 year old. Nobody really batted an eyelid then.
Forum motto?
tbf, I can kind of understand that if you're an immature 19yo and a mature 15yo. I actually feel more uncomfortable with the 30yo going out with the 17yo kind of scenario, when you're definitely old enough to realise they're very young...
Half your age + seven is the rule, I believe
Back when I were in school, you'd have been a social pariah fraternising with somebody in the year below!Mrs NW fresh from College then? ha
I'll suspect you're inconsistent with that, particularly on celebs and only reserve it for ones you take a dislike to, but I'll give you the benefit of doubt
That bloke (who's name i dont know or care for) that says Coven'ry. He did the checkatrade final commentary on sky. He annoys the fuck out of me.Is it on ifollow too? Thought we had to watch through sky if it was on there. As much as Clive and Oggy are annoying I'd prefer them over probably Lee Hendrie or someone.
1) showing one set of cunts to be in greater number than another set of cunts is not an endorsement. Cunts are cunts whatever their background.
2) It's the Guardian so I'm not surprised to read that
3) we all know Robinsons real name, but I do find it strange that so many find the way to try and take the high ground is to use his real name. Criticise what he stands for by all means, otherwise it simply smacks of childlike desperation to constantly use it.
Robinson is a grade A prick as I have mentioned on other threads over and over.
I see Rob's point though, sometimes it seems like people use it in a "hahaha I know your real name and have something on you to bother you" type way.
Easier to just call him a little shitcunt.
Hmmm. Got to say something doesn’t sit right with me on this. Reading the report here: https://assets.publishing.service.g...nt_data/file/944206/Group-based_CSE_Paper.pdf
The takeaway seems to be all available data suggests black and Asian ethnicities are over represented, even though a plurality are white. But then says there are data collection issues. Well yeah, but the data we do have says one thing and there’s no obvious reason given to disbelieve it. Unless we assume that all the cases where offender ethnicity wasn’t recorded were white people, but generally you assume missing data acts the same as data you’ve seen unless you’ve a good reason to think otherwise.
When you’ve got a situation where there’s a feeling of political correctness coming before justice, I’m not sure it’s wise to keep plying the same rhetorical games. Honesty and openness needed here, not concern that the facts make a group look bad. If there is an issue in some communities we need to know so we can design interventions that work for that community.
Yep. Spot on.
The "headlines" seem, shall we say selective, misleading perhaps?
I then double down on the doubt when I read that ethnicity data is missing....hhhmmmm.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?