I heard 6 weeksWeek longer too by all accounts
Agree. Would’ve preferred them to go with 40 teams and 8 groups of 5 than either of the two options to date. Only issue with that though is you don’t have all the teams in the group playing at the same time like with the three team plan.Not a fan of tournaments where finishing 3rd in a group of 4 gives you a 66% chance of progressing. It subdues the drama of the last group games. It's better than the stupid 3 team group idea though.
If they're adamant on having a 48 team tournament I would prefer an initial 'qualifying round' between say the 32 lowest ranked teams. The 16 winners then go through to the group stage to join the other 16 teams in 8 groups of 4.
Shown in this world cup with 4 games a dayYou can have too much of a good thing
Shown in this world cup with 4 games a day
3 was perfect
I’m looking forward to them having 210 of the 211 nations at the tournament with Scotland losing to San Marino in the Play Offs.I think they should just get straight to the inevitable conclusion whereby all 200 odd nations play each other home and away twice in a league structure before the top 128 teams go through to the knockout stages.