Well the only thing that removes governments (other than this one that’s pure self inflicted disaster) tends to be recessions. So comparing 2010, two years after the global financial crisis, to 1997 isn’t comparing apples to apples. When people make weirdly specific statistical claims like this...
As they were in 97. Probably far worse in terms of the state of the public sector buildings at least. I truly think people have forgotten what it was like.
But yes, let’s see. I predict a normal Labour govt, you and others predict I’m not sure what, some kind of cross between Thatcher and...
Whatever you want. Just interesting that that’s you’re comparison. Almost like Labour have a track record of producing even when a bunch of people are crying that they’re right wing because they arent offering nationalised Palestinian flags for non binaries.
I wouldn’t be hanging my hopes on AI. I think we need to build stuff. I’m worried by how it’s dropped out of Starmers mind seemingly, I guess because the same people that have stopped every other politician from taking on planning reform have stopped him too.
Didn’t they have this argument with snippets? I think the source links underneath will become important from both sides. I think their defence before was people clicking through.
Legally it’s a really interesting question. I think the theoretical economic incentives and huge amounts of cash...
Richer people can 100% be taxed more. Wealth can be taxed better but it’s all locked up in housing so it goes straight to “Granny in £1m London flat she’s lived in all her life can’t afford to live there”. Economically correct, morally correct especially in a small country, but politically...