I thought the one in the first half was close as well
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
I thought both decisions were right.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
No, ball in from the left and side-footed into bottom corner, unless I dreamed it !!Was that when he hammered it over?
No, ball in from the left and side-footed into bottom corner, unless I dreamed it !!
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
No, ball in from the left and side-footed into bottom corner, unless I dreamed it !!
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
Highlights confirm that the first was offside, even though Armstrong tied to do a little jink to get himself onside. Second also looks offside but would need to freeze frame.
Just watched, first was offside, second wasnt I dont think. The player by Fortune was playing him on
If you freeze frame it shows ads
Just watched, first was offside, second wasnt I dont think. The player by Fortune was playing him on
If you freeze frame it shows ads
not sure how you can call it from simply looking at the provided photos, making allowances for angles.
First decision - Offside. Relects poorly on Armstrong. Especially as he can use the 22 as a guide.
https://twitter.com/CJ_covblaze/status/706444729941172224
Second decision - Offside. At first glance I thought he was at least level but after seeing it a couple of times his knee and head are ahead of the last man. The lines from the mower make it a bit clearer.
https://twitter.com/CJ_covblaze/status/706444832277979137
To be honest, if we can't make our minds up and have to freeze frame and 1 frame/0.1 second is the difference between looking offside or looking onside, then it really isn't that bad a decision by the linesman by the naked eye.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors