Ref Watch on Sky Sports (1 Viewer)

Gynnsthetonic

Well-Known Member
Mar 9, 2012
3,376
3,360
213
The club won't gain anything out of going public on it, so i am not surprised. It's done now.
Doug normally very hands on and likes the media attention, nothing at all from him about the day as a whole
 

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2011
8,712
2,783
163
Coventry
Yep where is the picture in line?
it’s bonkers
I hope the silence form ccfc and the owner is that they are respectfully challenging the call
Please just stop this what do people expect , if you challenge something you are seeking a different outcome. Even if conclusive evidence could be found that Wright was onside is the fact that we lost the game going to be reversed no.
should there be a campaign to make sure that VAR be used as originally intended yes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: djr8369 and wingy

Gynnsthetonic

Well-Known Member
Mar 9, 2012
3,376
3,360
213
Please just stop this what do people expect , if you challenge something you are seeking a different outcome. Even if conclusive evidence could be found that Wright was onside is the fact that we lost the game going to be reversed no.
should there be a campaign to make sure that VAR be used as originally intended yes.
I wouldn't want the result reversed, I want recognition that it was too close to call and they got it wrong
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
Jan 7, 2016
6,242
5,328
313
The game took place on Sunday afternoon, surely the fact ‘that everyone is still debating and dissecting this incident on Wednesday afternoon, without anyone being able to produce any real evidence to definitively prove ‘one way or the other’ tells us that this definitely was not a ‘clear & obvious’ error by the on-field officials 🤔 it also raises huge questions as to how those in the Var room were able to reach such an important decision ‘that they were completely comfortable with’ in just 2 mins.
 

Users who are viewing this thread