Sky blue trust (1 Viewer)

Has psgm voted?

Yes he voted for himself to be CEO and head of. He also voted for himself as general manager, assistant and PA and hopes to run whatever he thinks he voted for in a Saddam
Hussein style of management.

In fact scrap that he will shortly announce that the trust have done nothing other than start another petition but remember his petition was best.
 

psgm1

Banned
Take a look at SBT website.
By the way this has nothing to do with PSGM1 or his buddies read what they say

LAUGHABLE.....

DID I NOT SAY THE TRUST WOULD TAKE CREDIT????

DID I NOT SAY THIS INFORMATION - YET GOT RIDICULED???

CLAIMING CREDIT FOR WHaT I DID!!!!

YET TRYING TO SILENCE ME


WHAT A SHAMEFUL ORGANISATION THE CLIQUE IS - WOULD THIS INFORMATION HAVE BEEN REVEALED HAD I NOT PUT IT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN HOURS AGO?

SHAMEFUL CLIQUE ( CANNOT IN ALL CONSCIENCE REFER TO THIS LOT AS TRUST ANYMORE - AS THEY ATTACKED ME THEN CLAIMED IT AS THEIR OWN!!))

THIS CLIQUES IS SINISTER, DECEITFUL ( REFUSE TO EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THEY GOT THE INFO FROM ME!!)

I SAID ALL ALONG THIS IS THE KIND OF UNDERHAND THING THE CLIQUE DOES!

THEY SHOULD BE HOLDING THEIR HEADS IN SHAME TODAY

THEY ARE A COMPLETE AND UTTER DISGRACE
 

lifelongcityfan

Well-Known Member
LAUGHABLE.....

DID I NOT SAY THE TRUST WOULD TAKE CREDIT????

DID I NOT SAY THIS INFORMATION - YET GOT RIDICULED???



CLAIMING CREDIT FOR WHaT I DID!!!!

YET TRYING TO SILENCE ME


WHAT A SHAMEFUL ORGANISATION THE CLIQUE IS - WOULD THIS INFORMATION HAVE BEEN REVEALED HAD I NOT PUT IT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN HOURS AGO?

SHAMEFUL CLIQUE ( CANNOT IN ALL CONSCIENCE REFER TO THIS LOT AS TRUST ANYMORE - AS THEY ATTACKED ME THEN CLAIMED IT AS THEIR OWN!!))

THIS CLIQUES IS SINISTER, DECEITFUL ( REFUSE TO EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THEY GOT THE INFO FROM ME!!)

I SAID ALL ALONG THIS IS THE KIND OF UNDERHAND THING THE CLIQUE DOES!

THEY SHOULD BE HOLDING THEIR HEADS IN SHAME TODAY

THEY ARE A COMPLETE AND UTTER DISGRACE

you are getting boring and repetitive now....
 

Godiva

Well-Known Member
This my friend is the result of our owners not listening to the supporters its a supporters trust that obviously have evidence of some sort that supports their action. In case you haven't noticed there is no liason with the fans the fire is out of control and as for poor management and poor judgement I think you're looking in the wrong direction. If Sisu get what they want then the trust will not be able to deal with them anyway its make or break

I totally agree that sisu/Fisher are to blame for their inabillity to build a honest rapport with the fans! I have said that numerous times, but am happy to repeat it.

But it doesn't alter my opionion that the Trust should keep their cool and not enter into open war with the owners of the club until all other venues have been explored and the options exhausted. Are they looking into the CCC and their part of the mess? Have they challenged them or their actions? Are they looking into ACL and their part of the mess? Have they demanded they go back to the negotiation table? Have they made demnds of arbitration?

I think not, so all options have not been exhausted.

I hope the Trust leadership at the very least have consulted a lawyer and made sure they can't be held liabel for any damages inflicted if sisu are denied the Golden Share as a direct or indirect result of the Trusts action. Because if there is something we do know about sisu - they are not slow to file lawsuits.
 

RogerH

New Member
LAUGHABLE.....

DID I NOT SAY THE TRUST WOULD TAKE CREDIT????

DID I NOT SAY THIS INFORMATION - YET GOT RIDICULED???

CLAIMING CREDIT FOR WHaT I DID!!!!

YET TRYING TO SILENCE ME


WHAT A SHAMEFUL ORGANISATION THE CLIQUE IS - WOULD THIS INFORMATION HAVE BEEN REVEALED HAD I NOT PUT IT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN HOURS AGO?

SHAMEFUL CLIQUE ( CANNOT IN ALL CONSCIENCE REFER TO THIS LOT AS TRUST ANYMORE - AS THEY ATTACKED ME THEN CLAIMED IT AS THEIR OWN!!))

THIS CLIQUES IS SINISTER, DECEITFUL ( REFUSE TO EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THEY GOT THE INFO FROM ME!!)

I SAID ALL ALONG THIS IS THE KIND OF UNDERHAND THING THE CLIQUE DOES!

THEY SHOULD BE HOLDING THEIR HEADS IN SHAME TODAY

THEY ARE A COMPLETE AND UTTER DISGRACE

I think by now everyone in the known universe is aware of your view about the Trust. For God's sake, give it a rest, you are becoming tedious.
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
Lol, suing the fans.,..now I've heard everything!
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
I think by now everyone in the known universe is aware of your view about the Trust. For God's sake, give it a rest, you are becoming tedious.

Becoming tedious?
 
Man am I getting smashed tonight
 

Nick

Administrator
LAUGHABLE.....

DID I NOT SAY THE TRUST WOULD TAKE CREDIT????

DID I NOT SAY THIS INFORMATION - YET GOT RIDICULED???

CLAIMING CREDIT FOR WHaT I DID!!!!

YET TRYING TO SILENCE ME


WHAT A SHAMEFUL ORGANISATION THE CLIQUE IS - WOULD THIS INFORMATION HAVE BEEN REVEALED HAD I NOT PUT IT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN HOURS AGO?

SHAMEFUL CLIQUE ( CANNOT IN ALL CONSCIENCE REFER TO THIS LOT AS TRUST ANYMORE - AS THEY ATTACKED ME THEN CLAIMED IT AS THEIR OWN!!))

THIS CLIQUES IS SINISTER, DECEITFUL ( REFUSE TO EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THEY GOT THE INFO FROM ME!!)

I SAID ALL ALONG THIS IS THE KIND OF UNDERHAND THING THE CLIQUE DOES!

THEY SHOULD BE HOLDING THEIR HEADS IN SHAME TODAY

THEY ARE A COMPLETE AND UTTER DISGRACE

Who said it is the same evidence? If it is then I apologise to you :D
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
The Trust board will be working with every means at its disposal including peaceful demonstration and other means of legal protest to ensure that the Administrator and the Football League do not return the “Golden Share” to any SISU controlled company, thus avoiding the nightmare scenario outlined above. We understand there are several alternative bidders available to receive the share and we will be urging that these bids are given precedence over SISU’s flawed plan.

Could you elaborate on this a little? The administrators role is covered by law so are you saying he should disregard the legal requirements? My understanding is at present SISU in their many guises are by far the largest creditor and one of the administrators main roles is to get what is considered to be the best deal for the creditors.

As for the football league and who they give the share to would they not have to go along with the administrators decision? The only reason I can see that they could refuse to give the golden share back to ltd in the event that it is purchased by SISU is through a failure of the F&P test and at present it seems, rather incredibly, that SISU would pass that? Are the trust compiling evidence that would give the league reason to fail SISU on the F&P test?

Has the trust met with any of the alternative bidders to asses their bids and suitability?

It's a nice idea but it does seem to be 'pissing in the wind' and as the only recognised representatives of the fans would time not be better spent looking into things that could actually impact on the outcome? I can think of a couple of things the trust are well positioned to do that would be of use:

with the help and support of supporters direct put pressure on the FL to public state the situation regarding the golden share and the status of the players. if they have, as is suspected, been separated was it done without the FLs knowledge or have the FL made a mistake which has backed them into a corner. other interested parties need to be able to bid in the knowledge that they will have ownership of all things CCFC.

pressure Fisher for evidence to backup his claims in the telegraph.

and to counter that request ACL provide evidence that Fisher is lying. In particular I would like the trust to get an assurance from ACL that whoever ends up in charge at the start of the season, be in the administrator, SISU or someone else can play at the very least this season at the Ricoh on the same terms as the final 3 games of last season.

as much as we as fans can come on here and slate SISU, and rightfully so, as an 'official' body my feeling is the trust have some level of burden of proof and if they can't supply that it severely weakens their position when talking with other official bodies. I would imagine as far as the FL and the administrator are concerned the trust is coming off as saying don't let SISU take control as we don't like them, would be must more effective to present a body of evidence that is much more difficult to ignore, for the FL in particular.
 

Nick

Administrator
Could you elaborate on this a little? The administrators role is covered by law so are you saying he should disregard the legal requirements? My understanding is at present SISU in their many guises are by far the largest creditor and one of the administrators main roles is to get what is considered to be the best deal for the creditors.

As for the football league and who they give the share to would they not have to go along with the administrators decision? The only reason I can see that they could refuse to give the golden share back to ltd in the event that it is purchased by SISU is through a failure of the F&P test and at present it seems, rather incredibly, that SISU would pass that? Are the trust compiling evidence that would give the league reason to fail SISU on the F&P test?

Has the trust met with any of the alternative bidders to asses their bids and suitability?

It's a nice idea but it does seem to be 'pissing in the wind' and as the only recognised representatives of the fans would time not be better spent looking into things that could actually impact on the outcome? I can think of a couple of things the trust are well positioned to do that would be of use:

with the help and support of supporters direct put pressure on the FL to public state the situation regarding the golden share and the status of the players. if they have, as is suspected, been separated was it done without the FLs knowledge or have the FL made a mistake which has backed them into a corner. other interested parties need to be able to bid in the knowledge that they will have ownership of all things CCFC.

pressure Fisher for evidence to backup his claims in the telegraph.

and to counter that request ACL provide evidence that Fisher is lying. In particular I would like the trust to get an assurance from ACL that whoever ends up in charge at the start of the season, be in the administrator, SISU or someone else can play at the very least this season at the Ricoh on the same terms as the final 3 games of last season.

as much as we as fans can come on here and slate SISU, and rightfully so, as an 'official' body my feeling is the trust have some level of burden of proof and if they can't supply that it severely weakens their position when talking with other official bodies. I would imagine as far as the FL and the administrator are concerned the trust is coming off as saying don't let SISU take control as we don't like them, would be must more effective to present a body of evidence that is much more difficult to ignore, for the FL in particular.

Good post, if the trust keep in with anti sisu statements then what happens if sisu stay in charge?
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Could you elaborate on this a little? The administrators role is covered by law so are you saying he should disregard the legal requirements? My understanding is at present SISU in their many guises are by far the largest creditor and one of the administrators main roles is to get what is considered to be the best deal for the creditors.

As for the football league and who they give the share to would they not have to go along with the administrators decision? The only reason I can see that they could refuse to give the golden share back to ltd in the event that it is purchased by SISU is through a failure of the F&P test and at present it seems, rather incredibly, that SISU would pass that? Are the trust compiling evidence that would give the league reason to fail SISU on the F&P test?

Has the trust met with any of the alternative bidders to asses their bids and suitability?

It's a nice idea but it does seem to be 'pissing in the wind' and as the only recognised representatives of the fans would time not be better spent looking into things that could actually impact on the outcome? I can think of a couple of things the trust are well positioned to do that would be of use:

with the help and support of supporters direct put pressure on the FL to public state the situation regarding the golden share and the status of the players. if they have, as is suspected, been separated was it done without the FLs knowledge or have the FL made a mistake which has backed them into a corner. other interested parties need to be able to bid in the knowledge that they will have ownership of all things CCFC.

pressure Fisher for evidence to backup his claims in the telegraph.

and to counter that request ACL provide evidence that Fisher is lying. In particular I would like the trust to get an assurance from ACL that whoever ends up in charge at the start of the season, be in the administrator, SISU or someone else can play at the very least this season at the Ricoh on the same terms as the final 3 games of last season.

as much as we as fans can come on here and slate SISU, and rightfully so, as an 'official' body my feeling is the trust have some level of burden of proof and if they can't supply that it severely weakens their position when talking with other official bodies. I would imagine as far as the FL and the administrator are concerned the trust is coming off as saying don't let SISU take control as we don't like them, would be must more effective to present a body of evidence that is much more difficult to ignore, for the FL in particular.

Great post.
 

psgm1

Banned
Yeah right it is just a PURE COINCIDENCE that for weeks the release NOT A SINGLE STATEMENT, yet the very day I release the info the clique claim credit!

NO SUCH THING AS COINCIDENCE

NO MATTER WHAT THE CLIQUE TROLLS WILL SHAMELESSLY CLAIM THIS AS THEIR OWN

WHICH IS ODD WHEN ONLY A FEW HOURS AGO THE EXACT SAME PEOPLE WERE SAYING THIS IS NOTHING NEW!

UTTER HYPOCRITES AT THE CLIQUE

WILL BE INTERESTING IF THE TRUST REVEAL THIS SOURCE THAT HAS COME TO LIGHT

EVERYONE KNOWS IT IS MY EMAIL, BUT OF COURSE IF THE CLIQUE HAS RECEIVED ANOTHER INDEPENDANT E-MAIL WILL THEY BE PREPARED TO RELEASE IT INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN AS I HAVE?

IF NOT WHY SHOULD THIS BE SECRET?

THE CLIQUE HAS FAR TOO MANY QUESTIONS TO ANSWER.

ALL THEY CAN DO IS ATTACK FANS WHO ARE ACTUALLY GETTING RESULTS!

IF ANYTHING THEY ARE A HINDRANCE NOT A HELP.

AND THE MEMBERS ARE FINDING THIS OUT.

ALSO INTERESTING HOW THE ATTACKS ARE FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE ONLY RECENTLY JOINED.

WHEN YOUR ONLY DEFENCE IS TROLLS YOU ARE WORTHLESS!
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
yeah right it is just a pure coincidence that for weeks the release not a single statement, yet the very day i release the info the clique claim credit!

No such thing as coincidence

no matter what the clique trolls will shamelessly claim this as their own

which is odd when only a few hours ago the exact same people were saying this is nothing new!

Utter hypocrites at the clique

will be interesting if the trust reveal this source that has come to light

everyone knows it is my email, but of course if the clique has received another independant e-mail will they be prepared to release it into the public domain as i have?

If not why should this be secret?

The clique has far too many questions to answer.

All they can do is attack fans who are actually getting results!

If anything they are a hindrance not a help.

And the members are finding this out.

Also interesting how the attacks are from people who have only recently joined.

When your only defence is trolls you are worthless!

what a tool!
 

psgm1

Banned
Good post, if the trust keep in with anti sisu statements then what happens if sisu stay in charge?

Does it matter? At the end of the day either you fight for what you believe in and let what happens happen, or you don't! And if you are not prepared to fight for what you believe then what is the point?

Existence for its OWN sake is worthless.

The clique just don't seem to understand this, or perhaps they just don't care about the club!
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Yeah right it is just a PURE COINCIDENCE that for weeks the release NOT A SINGLE STATEMENT, yet the very day I release the info the clique claim credit!

NO SUCH THING AS COINCIDENCE

NO MATTER WHAT THE CLIQUE TROLLS WILL SHAMELESSLY CLAIM THIS AS THEIR OWN

WHICH IS ODD WHEN ONLY A FEW HOURS AGO THE EXACT SAME PEOPLE WERE SAYING THIS IS NOTHING NEW!

UTTER HYPOCRITES AT THE CLIQUE

WILL BE INTERESTING IF THE TRUST REVEAL THIS SOURCE THAT HAS COME TO LIGHT

EVERYONE KNOWS IT IS MY EMAIL, BUT OF COURSE IF THE CLIQUE HAS RECEIVED ANOTHER INDEPENDANT E-MAIL WILL THEY BE PREPARED TO RELEASE IT INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN AS I HAVE?

IF NOT WHY SHOULD THIS BE SECRET?

THE CLIQUE HAS FAR TOO MANY QUESTIONS TO ANSWER.

ALL THEY CAN DO IS ATTACK FANS WHO ARE ACTUALLY GETTING RESULTS!

IF ANYTHING THEY ARE A HINDRANCE NOT A HELP.

AND THE MEMBERS ARE FINDING THIS OUT.

ALSO INTERESTING HOW THE ATTACKS ARE FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE ONLY RECENTLY JOINED.

WHEN YOUR ONLY DEFENCE IS TROLLS YOU ARE WORTHLESS!

Next you'll be telling us the world isn't flat. Please don't - too many exclusives in one day already for me.
 

psgm1

Banned
Can the trust also share the information they have had to base their statement on?

Doubt it as it is more than a coincidence this apparent evidence came out the EXACT SAME DAY I POSTED IT but a few hours later!

But I could be wrong. If I AM right however, then they really should at the very least acknowledge WHO they received the info from!

I have accused them of claiming credit for other's activities. If they have a PROVABLE alternate source - FINE

IF NOT they are trying to cash in, to gain additional membership based on MY efforts. And how is that NOT deceitful dishonest and sinister?

I revealed my source WHY won't the clique?
 

Nick

Administrator
Doubt it as it is more than a coincidence this apparent evidence came out the EXACT SAME DAY I POSTED IT but a few hours later!

But I could be wrong. If I AM right however, then they really should at the very least acknowledge WHO they received the info from!

I have accused them of claiming credit for other's activities. If they have a PROVABLE alternate source - FINE

IF NOT they are trying to cash in, to gain additional membership based on MY efforts. And how is that NOT deceitful dishonest and sinister?

I revealed my source WHY won't the clique?

Because everyone knew what you posted already, if it is the same info then they should all step down!
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Psgm 1 I have nothing to do with the Sky Blue trust. Your other thread about proving who owned the golden share proved nothing. Loads of people have tried to explain why in different ways. People have done this because they read what you say and give it consideration. Unlike you who obviously doesn't read anything, either that or you have no ability to comprehend anything. If the Trust are trying to hijack your barking detective work then god help us!

However I do genuinely believe your heart is for Coventry City FC and you really want to see it survive and for that I applaud you.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Who gives a fuck what what you say or think or if you were first or last we are all Inbreds and corrupt I was picketing anyway with my trust member friends the thing it is all about timing and now the time is right as in my earlier tread posted last week we will have proper banners made and march wherever play up sky blues by the way have had my e-mail and it's a yes
Doubt it as it is more than a coincidence this apparent evidence came out the EXACT SAME DAY I POSTED IT but a few hours later!

But I could be wrong. If I AM right however, then they really should at the very least acknowledge WHO they received the info from!

I have accused them of claiming credit for other's activities. If they have a PROVABLE alternate source - FINE

IF NOT they are trying to cash in, to gain additional membership based on MY efforts. And how is that NOT deceitful dishonest and sinister?

I revealed my source WHY won't the clique?
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Because everyone knew what you posted already, if it is the same info then they should all step down!

Step down where do you want to take it over with that other idiot psgm1 if so give me my pound back
 

CJ_covblaze

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator
Step down where do you want to take it over with that other idiot psgm1 if so give me my pound back

I said if it it's the same evidence that we all knew weeks ago and the trust are just acting then yes they should step down but I'd like to think they aren't that far behind!!
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
LIARS of course it is pgsm1 said so we all respect the way he has treated all of you why wouldn't you take his word for it ex general in the sas must have more contacts then you pgsm1 for prime minister
It's not the same evidence.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Like people have said before sometimes things that come out of a meeting cannot be made common knowledge for what ever reason there is always a right time for this to be disclosed.
I don't know if this is true in this case as I am not on the board, but a a manager I know how it hurts to sometimes have to keep something close to your chest
No I'm sure its not CJ and I'm sure in reality keeping Schtum was probably part of the plan
 

Steve.B50

Well-Known Member
Good post, if the trust keep in with anti sisu statements then what happens if sisu stay in charge?

Good point Nick
But my view (this is my thoughts not the Trust) if SISU are still in charge our club is dead regardless. What have we all got to loose?
 

Steve.B50

Well-Known Member
I said if it it's the same evidence that we all knew weeks ago and the trust are just acting then yes they should step down but I'd like to think they aren't that far behind!!

Nick, as I have said to u before, I personally would step down tomorrow but the roles we ave is who would want t take all this hassle on and time is not on our side.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top