CET: Full statement of rent collapse, 3 year run off period... (1 Viewer)

skyblu3sk

Well-Known Member
Ricoh bosses say Sky Blues rejected new rent offer

RENT deal talks between Ricoh Arena bosses and Coventry City Football Club owners Sisu have “collapsed“.
Arena Coventry Limited issued a strongly-worded statement yesterday afternoon saying: “Make no mistake, now is the time for Sisu to pay up or sell up and get out of Coventry“.

ACL, the company equally owned by Coventry City Council and the Alan Edward Higgs Trust, said the Sky Blues had rejected a new improved rent offer * despite them “shaking hands“ on it in face-to-face meetings.

ACL claims the Sky Blues have told them they now intend to build a new stadium.

The latest twist comes after the Sky Blues' rejection of an offer by Ricoh bosses late last year to cut the annual rent for using the stadium, from £1.29million to £400,000.

ACL had also issued a statutory demand for the club to pay back in full more than £1million of rent arrears, accrued since the football club began witholding monthly payments last April.

Talks resumed after Coventry City Council agreed a deal last month to buy out ACL's mortgage with Yorkshire Bank, and become its `banker' on more favourable mortgage payment terms.

Council leaders claimed at the time that alleviated a threat to ACL's financial viability from hedge fund Sisu's withdrawal of rent, and potentially paved the way for a belated rental agreement.

But yesterday's ACL statement read: “The board of Arena Coventry Limited regrets to announce that talks with Sisu, the owners of Coventry City Football Club, in relation to rent arrears and future rent and match day revenue arrangements, have collapsed.’’ The ACL board said an agreement had been reached verbally on January 29 after being discussed “point by point” in a series of meetings with the three directors of CCFC, John Clarke, Tim Fisher and Mark Labovitch.

The statement added: “The club directors, however, then proceeded to renege on this agreement. This is wholly unacceptable to the Board of ACL.” ACL says, as of February 1, the football club owes it £1.347 million in rent arrears. The latest offer to the club would have waived part of this.

ACL said: “The offer set the rent payable by CCFC at £400,000 per annum while the club remains in Football League 1.

“It included agreement from ACL to waive more than £300,000 of the £1.347 million rent arrears, with a generous approach to clearing the balance. It also agreed the principle of ACL matchday revenues benefitting CCFC, and ACL paying

a larger share of rates on the stadium.
“Instead of confirming its written acceptance, CCFC then proposed an alternative Heads of Terms, which bore no relation to that agreed. It demanded the waiver by ACL of all rent arrears claims pre-dating 1 January 2013. It demanded also the withdrawal of the statutory demand for the payment of rent arrears issued by ACL against CCFC on 5 December 2012.

“It was accompanied by an emailed statement from Tim Fisher declaring that CCFC has `no option but to build a new venue' and that CCFC's proposals were predicated on playing at the Ricoh Arena for a `run-off period of three years.“

ACL chairman Nicholas Carter said: “To spend many hours engaging in positive and constructive discussions, leading to a detailed point by point discussion of a proposed Heads of Terms Agreement resulting in verbal agreement and handshakes all round, only to then renege when it came to signing the agreement, is truly reprehensible behaviour.

“There’s simply no point in continuing these discussions while the club, under Sisu’s ownership, continues to behave in this manner.

“We will only be prepared to resume these conversations if John Clarke, Tim Fisher and Mark Labovitch (the Sky Blues board) sign up to the deal to which they agreed. If the club directors can’t or won’t follow through on the agreement they participated in creating, then we suggest to them that the time has come to consider offering ownership of CCFC to an outside buyer better placed to run the club’s financial operations. Make no mistake, now is the time for Sisu to pay up or sell up and get out of Coventry.” ACL’s statement added: “The board of ACL believes that Sisu have no intention of entering into a meaningful dialogue to resolve this issue.’’ A club spokesman said they were planning to release a statement today.
 

nicksig

Active Member
How quickly things change. I went to Sheffield utd away and came home buzzing. Now we have no manager, no stadium and nothing left to play for this season except avoid relegation. Gutted
 

aviles

Well-Known Member
How quickly things change. I went to Sheffield utd away and came home buzzing. Now we have no manager, no stadium and nothing left to play for this season except avoid relegation. Gutted

is that a serious comment. how anyone is writing this season off i dont know ! correct me if im wrong but when robins took over we were 23rd we are now 7 points of playoffs 17 clear of relegation. we have everything to play for. we technically have two potential wembley places to fight for, when in your time as a coventry fan have you ever been able to say that in a season !
 

kg82

Well-Known Member
Pretty sure we have a lot more to play for than just avoiding relegation.

I do find it a bit strange that it seems there's been all these positive talks, smiles and handshakes all round, only for SISU to pull out of an agreed deal (I hope they have a plan). It seems something monumental will happen to our club sooner rather than later.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Pretty sure we have a lot more to play for than just avoiding relegation.

I do find it a bit strange that it seems there's been all these positive talks, smiles and handshakes all round, only for SISU to pull out of an agreed deal (I hope they have a plan). It seems something monumental will happen to our club sooner rather than later.

Fisher just confirmed deal was not agreed.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
He's right there is nothing to play for!! Stuffing completely knocked out of us fans and we give a toss. Not sure how it will be any better for the players
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
TF also agreed the club was "stuffed" irrespective of the rent .............. think the guy on CWR caught him on the hop with that
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
"Hell will freeze over" before the Club is given revenue from naming rights, concessions, car parking etc. Mutton didn't mention that, did he?
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
"Hell will freeze over" before the Club is given revenue from naming rights, concessions, car parking etc. Mutton didn't mention that, did he?

What is your minority view torch?

I am interested, where do you think SIiSU will take us over the next few years.

What will happen with the stadium, playing squad. Our aim of getting back to the premiership.

Please don't say there is no alternative.

More interested in what you think the future holds for Coventry city under SiSU?
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
we have possibly the most negative fans in the country !

:claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands:

31k at a semi final of the tin pot cup shows how long this club has been starved of success. Its a bloody miricle that they have to open more than one row of seats at the ricoh, let alone get the attnednaces we do
 

Southerner79

New Member
What is your minority view torch?<br />
<br />
I am interested, where do you think SIiSU will take us over the next few years. <br />
<br />
What will happen with the stadium, playing squad. Our aim of getting back to the premiership. <br />
<br />
Please don't say there is no alternative.<br />
<br />
More interested in what you think the future holds for Coventry city under SiSU?
<br />
<br />


More interested in what the future holds for CCFC with no access to additional revenue within an FFP environment and no asset value.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Someone's telling porkies, or there is much spin.

ACL said a verbal agreement was reached and they all shook hands on it. Fisher says no agreement was reached.

To be honest they could be both right.

Maybe they shook on it but Fisher is talking about a signed agreement rather than a verbal one.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
Think what actually happened Otis was that the directors from ACL that were there had the power and authority to agree a deal where as the 3 directors from CCFC were assumed to have the authority and it turned out only the "owner", who was not there, could agree any deal. So you are probably right that both sides can claim to be right yet opposite in view. More spin

Why go to a meeting to sort it out and not have the authority to agree anything ? Why waste everyones time?
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Think what actually happened Otis was that the directors from ACL that were there had the power and authority to agree a deal where as the 3 directors from CCFC were assumed to have the authority and it turned out only the "owner" could agree any deal. So you are probably right that both sides can claim to be right yet opposite in view. More spin

Why go to a meeting to sort it out and not have the authority to agree anything ? Why waste everyones time?

Exactly right OSB.

It's a complete mess whatever side you are on. Many of us are in fact not on any side and just wish the thing to be resolved.
 

nicksig

Active Member
Give us a break! We're languishing the 3rd division with no manager and no guarantee of a stadium to play in - and quite possibly bankrupt - and you think we are negative?! Where are the positives?

we have possibly the most negative fans in the country !
 

CCFC_GT

New Member
<br />
<br />


More interested in what the future holds for CCFC with no access to additional revenue within an FFP environment and no asset value.

For me the nub of the problem is that without additional revenue from naming rights, concessions, car parking etc., in the FFP environment we are in our football club has little chance of progressing, with or without SISU.
As long as Mutton, his cronies at the city council, and ACL continue to leech off our club by either refusing to sell, or asking an extortionate price for the rights to these income streams, CCFC cannot get onto a financially sound footing, and progress in the way we all want it to.
Does anyone believe the council / ACL are just against SISU and would ask for a lower price for the rights to revenue streams if new owners of the football club were in place? I for one don't think so.
 

Sbarcher

Well-Known Member
After the current spat, can SISU really believe that the Council will grant permission for another stadium within the City boundaries? It will never happen.
Therefore we are looking at a stadium probably 10 miles from Cov.
If SISU have the money for this, then they've really f*cked up the PR and isolated all Ricoh partners. If they'd have handled this in a more professional and reasonable attitude they could have had the Ricoh with Council and ACL blessing. Now they have managed to completely p*ss off the other parties.
They seem to have no strategy for the long term, this shooting from the hip is not a negotiation and they are digging themselves a deeper hole with every statement.

I thought SISU had turned a corner, but they have turned up sh*t creek.
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
After the current spat, can SISU really believe that the Council will grant permission for another stadium within the City boundaries? It will never happen.
Therefore we are looking at a stadium probably 10 miles from Cov.
If SISU have the money for this, then they've really f*cked up the PR and isolated all Ricoh partners. If they'd have handled this in a more professional and reasonable attitude they could have had the Ricoh with Council and ACL blessing. Now they have managed to completely p*ss off the other parties.
They seem to have no strategy for the long term, this shooting from the hip is not a negotiation and they are digging themselves a deeper hole with every statement.

I thought SISU had turned a corner, but they have turned up sh*t creek.

Exactly how I feel
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
After the current spat, can SISU really believe that the Council will grant permission for another stadium within the City boundaries? It will never happen.
Therefore we are looking at a stadium probably 10 miles from Cov.
If SISU have the money for this, then they've really f*cked up the PR and isolated all Ricoh partners. If they'd have handled this in a more professional and reasonable attitude they could have had the Ricoh with Council and ACL blessing. Now they have managed to completely p*ss off the other parties.
They seem to have no strategy for the long term, this shooting from the hip is not a negotiation and they are digging themselves a deeper hole with every statement.

I thought SISU had turned a corner, but they have turned up sh*t creek.

A new stadium is a nonsense, it won't happen. It doesn't even make financial sense and it certainly won't even get planning permission yet alone get built within the 3 year timeline Fisher goes on about.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top