Charlton Owners (1 Viewer)

[Nick]

 

---

[Pipehitterz]

Holy 'nanny state ' shit.

Are they serious,

 

[Liquid Gold]

Fucking hell, I'm surprised the sponsors have allowed their logos on that letter

 

[Otis]

What!! That is outrageous.

Big Brother or what!

I wonder if Sisu have got time to meet up with 9,000+ fans individually?

 

[Otis]

Would be interested to see what he has written though.

If it is libelous then that might make a bit more sense, but still.

 

[Otis]

I see that is from the safety officer. Bit odd if the guy is no physical threat at games. Has he threatened someone at the club perhaps?

 

[Nick]

It is hard to say without knowing what the other guy has done though to be fair. For all we know he is threatening violence, or pitch invasions etc.

 

[olderskyblue]

What!! That is outrageous.

Big Brother or what!

I wonder if Sisu have got time to meet up with 9,000+ fans individually?

They did have "secret" meetings with some of the worst offenders on here.... Nick organised it..

 

[Nick]

They did have "secret" meetings with some of the worst offenders on here.... Nick organised it..

They were never seen again.

The amount of headless horses found that week shot up too!

 

[rd45]

Christ. Our owners are bad but this is a whole other level. What a way to alienate your fans.

 

[eastwoodsdustman]

Like others have said. Depends on what he's said/done in the past. Similar things were going on in Blackpool with some nasty stuff posted about the owners and some of it not true leading to the libel case. People have a right to show their dissatisfaction but there is a line which shouldn't be crossed. Just because its a football club and passions run high doesn't mean people can overstep the lines of acceptability.

 

[Nick]

Like others have said. Depends on what he's said/done in the past. Similar things were going on in Blackpool with some nasty stuff posted about the owners and some of it not true leading to the libel case. People have a right to show their dissatisfaction but there is a line which shouldn't be crossed. Just because its a football club and passions run high doesn't mean people can overstep the lines of acceptability.

Very true. They can't cross the line and then moan when the football club act upon it or threaten legal action.

 

[chiefdave]

Anyone know what he said? If he's trying to start trouble, being racist or something similar then fair enough. If he's just saying the team were crap or the owners are rubbish then this really isn't on.

 

[Covstu]

FOOKIN Hell! We wouldn't have anyone in our ground if we took that approach!! What is he on probation???!

 

[Otis]

No, death row!!

 

[vow]

Thier Chairman is clearly a WUM.

 

[Grendel]

I've had a letter from Joy inviting me to the directors box every game.

 

[vow]

ah yes, talking of WUM's........

 

[Terry Gibson's perm]

All this sort of stuff just puts the bar a bit higher for our owners to aspire to.

 

[CJ_covblaze]

Roland is an arsehole of the highest order. Not much between him and Oyston when it comes to ownership imo.

 

[wingy]

Roland is an arsehole of the highest order. Not much between him and Oyston when it comes to ownership imo.

Yep
I bet they're pining for the days of Fisher and Waggot.

 

[Grendel]

Anyone know what he said? If he's trying to start trouble, being racist or something similar then fair enough. If he's just saying the team were crap or the owners are rubbish then this really isn't on.

The owners admit nothing of the sort. No defemation but a negative attitude to the owners.