D
Ddccfc
Guest
What exactly did we "do"? Access publicly available information on the Internet and publish it on a forum.
Gosh. Who would do such a thing?!
Coventry City FC's Players are registered with Limited, not Holdings (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter FootyLawBlog
- Start date
What exactly did we "do"? Access publicly available information on the Internet and publish it on a forum.
Gosh. Who would do such a thing?!
lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
My name is Tim Fisher.
Don't really see why any journalist would wish to remain anonymous myself, though he hasn't confirmed that it is him.
If it is him, he'd probably get on very well with Japandy!
I just looked into if what ddccfc said to see if it had any veracity.
From what I saw it doesn't, and I said that.
Sure that as a journallist and broadcaster Footylaw would appreciate sources being checked for their accuracy?
To be fair though it was twats like you who would accuse me of being a Leicester fan years ago for researching stuff about Sisu and putting it onto messageboards because it didn't fit their views so would rather not know.
Otis
Well-Known Member
Time to get a new username me thinks.
You are coming across like a bit of a coward who can't back up what he has posted to be honest.
You can't just come out with this on good authority nonsense and then not quantify it.
duffer
Well-Known Member
The thing about the value of the players on the books in the Administrator's document?
That was your 'evidence'?
I'd like to know how you drew from that, that FLB was wrong.
So then, since you've worked it out, does that sum represent the value of a single player at the club, or four players, or all players? Is it amortised? How does it fit in with what was in CCFC Ltd's books?
You've grabbed at one figure, that I doubt you even tried to understand fully, on and that levied the accusation in your very next post that FLB must somehow be in cahoots with ACL.
Doesn't add up to me. Following your logic I should probably accuse you of being engaged by SISU, and ask you to prove that you aren't. I'll need your name for that, obviously.
Of course, I wouldn't stoop that low. Most wouldn't.
lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
Fuck off, you're just a c**t.
Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
There's only one c**t around here, and your one of them:jerkit:
Nick
Administrator
Does it not show something about you having rows with everyone? To be fair if the guy didn't want his name known, would he have posted it on his website?
Joy seppala doesn't want to be in the public eye but I bet if you had a picture of her you would out her?
lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
Only one and I'm one of them?
Nick
Administrator
Just nearly spat my drink out, watch it else he might kick you with his arm!
duffer
Well-Known Member
So then, you admit that what you accused FLB of was in fact a complete and utter lie.
Best to file your posts under dangerous misdirection, not ill-informed admittedly, just flat out bullshit under the guise of anonymity.
Wasn't too hard to discredit you, was it. Pathetic.
Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
It seems my comedy is beyond you summerisle...Nick....You are no better than him.:jerkit:
lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
It was too hard for most to discredit him.
FootyLawBlog
New Member
Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
WTF is wrong with you Nick? Don't you respect someones right to anonimity.
Just because I've had rows with posters doesn't mean I started the row.l think you need to get your house in order before making assumptions
Don't give me the bollox about FLB and his web site. He deserves the right of anonimity on this forum.
If this sort of thing is going to be the "Norm" then you can shove your forum up your arse.
lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
You can watch us on Sopcast.
Otis
Well-Known Member
Anyone else immediately thought of 'Cheers' as soon as they read that out to themselves?
lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
Is ~Sky Blue Kid a less bright Coach?
Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
Is summerisle thrush? coz he's an irritating c**t!
Wonder If SL could extract that from the Broadcast CJ?
Better keep the receipt were his exact words.
Its a little odd as I checked his History on here after yesterday and there's a thread he started on the same subject matter ,covering pretty much Identical ground ,same questions raised and attempts at answering . So I'm curious as to why his perspective has changed??:thinking about:
D
Ddccfc
Guest
If you think I need to apologise, you really have missed the point.
Just while you're hereDDccfc ,what Is so different now to the thread you started that I've highlighted?
FootyLawBlog
New Member
The "point" is that this thread has exposed you to be nothing more than an outright liar.
For those who missed it over the weekend:
and then, after much huffing and puffing:
mattylad
Member
This made me laugh, first time I have seen short man syndrome on a web forum! what a tit ha ha
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
I'll see if I can make a stab at the point he was getting at
Many posts on this board arbitrarily saying, for example, Appleton has links with Seppala and SISU that result in suggestions of him being in their pay to do dubious deads, and for some reason these have gained currency despite there being no evidence whatsoever and, more to the point, one of the losing bidders being at pains to say he was happy with the professionalism of the administrator, and the legality of the process.
This and other statements made take on the mantel of fact by virtue of being made and repeated on this board, it becomes rather self referential and a circular web of evidence where the same mantras are repeated.
The veracity of the evidence is never challenged however. Just this gets a ferocious defence because it chimes with the dominant POV, while other sweeping statements are allowed to pass because they don't.
Now (I think ) that's what he was getting at here, that it's easy to throw out casual accusations with no foundation, and cast doubt on processes. It does, admittedly, seem to have backfired a little and it would be unfortunate from the POV of the blog writer that he's the guinea pig for this little experiment.
Many posts on this board arbitrarily saying, for example, Appleton has links with Seppala and SISU that result in suggestions of him being in their pay to do dubious deads, and for some reason these have gained currency despite there being no evidence whatsoever and, more to the point, one of the losing bidders being at pains to say he was happy with the professionalism of the administrator, and the legality of the process.
This and other statements made take on the mantel of fact by virtue of being made and repeated on this board, it becomes rather self referential and a circular web of evidence where the same mantras are repeated.
The veracity of the evidence is never challenged however. Just this gets a ferocious defence because it chimes with the dominant POV, while other sweeping statements are allowed to pass because they don't.
Now (I think
) that's what he was getting at here, that it's easy to throw out casual accusations with no foundation, and cast doubt on processes. It does, admittedly, seem to have backfired a little and it would be unfortunate from the POV of the blog writer that he's the guinea pig for this little experiment.Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
NW I would say that it's more that he obstinately stuck by an assertion about an individual which has proven to be false.
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
Exactly. The ability to say a vague statement on a messageboard with no foundation in anything other than personal belief and a desire to cast doubt.
Anyway, whatever else is said and done, whatever else is in doubt, everybody now knows for certain he has no links to Guilfoyle or ACL ;-)
Last edited:
