Calista
Well-Known Member
First 21 games before Bayliss made his debut:
F 21 A 14
35 goals = 1.7 goals per match at either end
Win ratio 43%
Last 24 matches since Bayliss started playing (I realise he’s missed a couple, if anyone can be bothered to separate those games out, please feel free!):
F 43 A 33
76 goals = 3.2 goals per match at either end
Win ratio 54%
Before Robins introduced Tom Bayliss, we were basically a tight team and many of the games were low-scoring. A few I saw were desperately boring. Since he made his debut in mid December, we have changed completely and the games have opened up. 44 goals at either end in our last 10 games.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not holding Bayliss up as the messiah, but it shows how much the balance of the midfield affects the game. More creativity makes chances, but exposes the back four and can make previously solid defenders look like fools. Likewise, strikers who couldn’t hit a barn door start enjoying themselves and scoring.
F 21 A 14
35 goals = 1.7 goals per match at either end
Win ratio 43%
Last 24 matches since Bayliss started playing (I realise he’s missed a couple, if anyone can be bothered to separate those games out, please feel free!):
F 43 A 33
76 goals = 3.2 goals per match at either end
Win ratio 54%
Before Robins introduced Tom Bayliss, we were basically a tight team and many of the games were low-scoring. A few I saw were desperately boring. Since he made his debut in mid December, we have changed completely and the games have opened up. 44 goals at either end in our last 10 games.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not holding Bayliss up as the messiah, but it shows how much the balance of the midfield affects the game. More creativity makes chances, but exposes the back four and can make previously solid defenders look like fools. Likewise, strikers who couldn’t hit a barn door start enjoying themselves and scoring.