If players and cash are available I’d go for an AM and CB on loan. AM can play with O’Hare in a box or both can offer cover/challenge.
If players and cash are available I’d go for an AM and CB on loan. AM can play with O’Hare in a box or both can offer cover/challenge.
What came before (amassing huge debts) put us in the position we found ourselves when SISU were the only buyer to come in and save us at the 11th hour & 59th minute, otherwise we’d have ended up like Derby & Reading this season or worse, gone out of business! Although errors have been made in the past over the past 3 or 4 years things have stabilised and we’re on the UP. It starts with one gamble that doesn’t pay off and ends up with debts of hundreds of millions ££££££.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Robins never buys in January but good loans with a view to purchase next season to upgrade the squad are likely surely
We got fucked by relegation and ITV Digital collapsing and some spectacular mismanagement on and off the pitch.
I’d much rather we’d gone bust then with the rules as they were than get what we got the last decade TBH.
In:
Back up for O’hare
Competition at left back
A cm partner for Sheaf
Out:
Hamer
Jones
Da Costa etc
Back up for O’hare
Competition at left back
A cm partner for Sheaf
Out:
Hamer
Jones
Da Costa etc
Agree with that. CB can wait until the summer when McF will need a replacement along with a few others.
The external debt wasn't massive anyway really, it was the Coop bank and a small % of the total. Robinson should have written it off / put the club into administration in 2002
You're in a dreamland if you think Robins is just going to be handed a pile of cash to spend in January. The question for me is will the owners be able to come up with the money if Robins makes a specific request as he's identified an issue that needs addressing.
The problem with 'backing your man' is its a bit like Richardsons 'have a punt'. Great if it comes off, not so good if it doesn't.
You've also got the problem of who is available. Its all well and good saying we need better options and backup but while we're saying that we're also saying the likes of Walker will be demanding a move as they aren't playing every week. If the players we've got are going to be demanding moves as they're too good to be sat on the bench who are we expecting to sign that will strengthen the squad?
The problem with 'backing your man' is its a bit like Richardsons 'have a punt'. Great if it comes off, not so good if it doesn't.
You've also got the problem of who is available. Its all well and good saying we need better options and backup but while we're saying that we're also saying the likes of Walker will be demanding a move as they aren't playing every week. If the players we've got are going to be demanding moves as they're too good to be sat on the bench who are we expecting to sign that will strengthen the squad?
It’s nothing like having a punt - these owners have made very little capital investment into the club and none at all for 10 years yet have little interest in revenue impacts of stilt business decisions
