So this is their take.
So everyone can determine what this means.....
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/2157/regulation/6/made
Rather than ask an administrator loaded questions and get loaded answers, far better to get the facts as we know them!
Basically sisu NOW claiming although they don't OWN the golden share, they are acting as trustees.
But if this is the case, then surely the legal owner has a right to sell that and remove trustees as they see fit! In other words they can SELL the golden share (as long as league approve)
If true (and is only my take, that means it will be sisu having to take the administrators to court when he accepts the only bid on the table!)
Fingers crossed!!!
Oh and I don't charge a membership for finding out facts about the situation and than making fatuous press releases!
So everyone can determine what this means.....
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/2157/regulation/6/made
Rather than ask an administrator loaded questions and get loaded answers, far better to get the facts as we know them!
Basically sisu NOW claiming although they don't OWN the golden share, they are acting as trustees.
But if this is the case, then surely the legal owner has a right to sell that and remove trustees as they see fit! In other words they can SELL the golden share (as long as league approve)
If true (and is only my take, that means it will be sisu having to take the administrators to court when he accepts the only bid on the table!)
Fingers crossed!!!
Oh and I don't charge a membership for finding out facts about the situation and than making fatuous press releases!