You may be right, Id hope most don't see it as one option and if the bidding process is reopened then we know more about the options on the table.
The problem with all this at the moment, is it means sub-stories running parallel to the main one get a bit lost. Another time, another place(!) and they'd be quite worth delving into, they might even be the main headlines... or they might generate the main headlines of course.
There's an interesting little one about how the Haskell/Elliott/Hoffman bid has been framed. In a way, it's a more media savvy version of that which saw SISU as only option.
It is, in short, an attempt to create a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Doubly unfortunate that Elliott is heading up the only group to talk about fan involvement, when he was so active in taking it away previously!
Personally I can live without fan ownership. In this country, it tends not to work so well, and even when it does (Exeter) the club reaches a stage where the self-same fans get ever louder in their desire to show some ambition, give it a go, push the boat out on the wage budget or a new signing. A decent responsible chairman who quite fancies owning us (as opposed to AN Other football club) and wants us for reasons other than financial gains or property development opportunities would do me...
I know, I know, I've just woken up. But I can dream, can't I?
What I wouldn't do is trust promises made by people who have made countless vapid statements before, who bend like the willow, and who follow the winds of change...