For months this moribund organisation has been cosying up to the local media, seemingly endlessly appearing on as fan of the week, and indeed where it not being shamed into doing so and released some questions today, have effectively done less than a=one person has done on their own!
Is it not time for the SBT to stand up for the fans and categorically denounce sisu in public?
Is it not time now to refuse to deal with sisu as sisu have refused to even to pretend to negotiate?
More inmportantly will the SBT finally come out and ask that if P4 wants REAL fan participation, that he if successful have a brand new share issue, to allow the fans to have a GENUINE link with the club.
The German model the SBT makes great claim to want to emulate is based on not just fan participation, but actual tangible links via shared ownership.
Pompey and swansea - 2 other teams they have used as a reference point BOTH FINANCIALLY input into the club.
Yet surprise surprise the SBT has NEVER (since their initial claims of expecting a few thousand to provide £1000 each was realised to be utterly ridiculous) even entertained having an OPEN share issue amongst ANY fan.
Maybe this is their view, maybe it isn't, but considering if there is a plan then surely it should be out in public domain.
SO WILL THE SBT BACK A SHARE ISSUE FOR THE FANS OR NOT? IF NOT WHY NOT?
They have asked questions today of the administrator, well I am asking questions of you!
After all if you want to be the voice of the fans, this is surely NOT an unreasonable thing to expect - after all the criticism sisu got for being secretive.
I would suggest there can be little if any question that the original shareholders may want to once again enjoy the position they once held, and heaven knows the club could do with the additional funds!
Will the SBT push for a Share issue for all fans? I guess not - but would be pleasently surprised if they did!
Obtaining the position of spokespeople of the fans is fine, but if you do NOTHING with it, then WHAT IS THE POINT?
I'm pretty sure the SBT members are do not want the group they paid to join to sit on the fence.
As voice of the fans you SHOULD represent the fans. Garnering favour withe the owners is NOT what you are supposed to be - and was definitely NOT what you claimed when you first started posting.
SO come on SBT. Your members seem pretty quick to try and belittle me, to try and silence me, but this is a FAIR question. And if you expect answers from others over tricky questions, not unreasonable for you to expect the same.
If you don't like tricky questions - fine, disband, but if you expect to have power, you expect to hold the position of fans spokespeople then you SHOULD be accountable. Not to me, I couldn't give a rat's ass if you answer me, but you SHOULD answer to your members. Unless of course they are happy for you to sit on the fence and post rhetorical questions on a forum, and attack someone for holding you to account the same way you SHOULD be holding sisu to account!
So what are you SBT Man or Mouse?
Let forth the public hate campaign from the thought police!
Is it not time for the SBT to stand up for the fans and categorically denounce sisu in public?
Is it not time now to refuse to deal with sisu as sisu have refused to even to pretend to negotiate?
More inmportantly will the SBT finally come out and ask that if P4 wants REAL fan participation, that he if successful have a brand new share issue, to allow the fans to have a GENUINE link with the club.
The German model the SBT makes great claim to want to emulate is based on not just fan participation, but actual tangible links via shared ownership.
Pompey and swansea - 2 other teams they have used as a reference point BOTH FINANCIALLY input into the club.
Yet surprise surprise the SBT has NEVER (since their initial claims of expecting a few thousand to provide £1000 each was realised to be utterly ridiculous) even entertained having an OPEN share issue amongst ANY fan.
Maybe this is their view, maybe it isn't, but considering if there is a plan then surely it should be out in public domain.
SO WILL THE SBT BACK A SHARE ISSUE FOR THE FANS OR NOT? IF NOT WHY NOT?
They have asked questions today of the administrator, well I am asking questions of you!
After all if you want to be the voice of the fans, this is surely NOT an unreasonable thing to expect - after all the criticism sisu got for being secretive.
I would suggest there can be little if any question that the original shareholders may want to once again enjoy the position they once held, and heaven knows the club could do with the additional funds!
Will the SBT push for a Share issue for all fans? I guess not - but would be pleasently surprised if they did!
Obtaining the position of spokespeople of the fans is fine, but if you do NOTHING with it, then WHAT IS THE POINT?
I'm pretty sure the SBT members are do not want the group they paid to join to sit on the fence.
As voice of the fans you SHOULD represent the fans. Garnering favour withe the owners is NOT what you are supposed to be - and was definitely NOT what you claimed when you first started posting.
SO come on SBT. Your members seem pretty quick to try and belittle me, to try and silence me, but this is a FAIR question. And if you expect answers from others over tricky questions, not unreasonable for you to expect the same.
If you don't like tricky questions - fine, disband, but if you expect to have power, you expect to hold the position of fans spokespeople then you SHOULD be accountable. Not to me, I couldn't give a rat's ass if you answer me, but you SHOULD answer to your members. Unless of course they are happy for you to sit on the fence and post rhetorical questions on a forum, and attack someone for holding you to account the same way you SHOULD be holding sisu to account!
So what are you SBT Man or Mouse?
Let forth the public hate campaign from the thought police!
