telegraph report fulham want mowbray (25 Viewers)

martcov

Well-Known Member
Oh yes it is don't you know the rules?

Yes, of course..... Have we got an "ethics committee" on this forum? No doubt if we did, the honesty of poster's statements could be tested. We could then compare the honestly of certain posters with that of certain councillors.
 

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Yes, of course..... Have we got an "ethics committee" on this forum? No doubt if we did, the honesty of poster's statements could be tested. We could then compare the honestly of certain posters with that of certain councillors.

Wish you would keep up don't you know that most of the posters on here are from the council
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Wish you would keep up don't you know that most of the posters on here are from the council

Kill two birds with one stone...... See you at the next council meeting. Shall we have a drink before we go in.... We can have a chat about suppressing stories with the editor at the bar.... Oops.....
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Kill two birds with one stone...... See you at the next council meeting. Shall we have a drink before we go in.... We can have a chat about suppressing stories with the editor at the bar.... Oops.....

You could have a chat on a football related thread.

Oh hold on
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator
Kill two birds with one stone...... See you at the next council meeting. Shall we have a drink before we go in.... We can have a chat about suppressing stories with the editor at the bar.... Oops.....
You could join him being briefed (it wasn't the current one though, it was the one who mysteriously vanished)
 

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
How do you know he won't be interested? Have you asked him?

Haven't you figured out yet that 95% of what is stated on here (often as fact) is supposition or speculation, or repeating someone elses supposition or speculation?
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
You could have a chat on a football related thread.

Oh hold on

I prefer following the comments on the match thread when I can, or if I can watch the match, just watching CCFC. Anyway, where is the quote where I confirmed Fulham's interest in Mowbray? Or ar you going to admit you were bullshitting? Set a good example to Ann and John.
 
D

Deleted member 2477

Guest
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sp...ham-manager-search-cottagers-chasing-10595446

You have to ask why the ct have made such a big spread about fulham and their search for a manager when there is simply no foundation to it. This for me is purely the ct trying to stir things up whatever their motivation is. A simple paragraph saying fulham are showing interest in tm would have suficed but no. They put more effort into reporting on fulham plight and the wasps than they do supporting the local football team. Thats why i dont buy it anymore as its not a paper for coventry people
 

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
torchomatic;10066n44 said:
I know the rules. No criticism of:

CCC
CT
Wasps

Open season on:

CCFC
SISU
Les Reid

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

Ok point out where I have actively supported CCC,I admit I get pissed off with the posts regarding the so called Wasps telegraph and the so called anti CCFC agenda ,Wasps my thoughts on them are well
documented.

When have I posted an anti CCFC post except for the SISU element?
Open season on SISU you better believe it and no matter what they do now or in the future that will remain till the day I die.
Les Reid sometimes I have a go other times I don't to me he's a nothing.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Which story, the " nothing happened today " story about RBC and the stadium? Or the " nothing happened today " story that a championship team thinks that Mowbray would be a good manager for them? Which one do I think has credence?

I prefer following the comments on the match thread when I can, or if I can watch the match, just watching CCFC. Anyway, where is the quote where I confirmed Fulham's interest in Mowbray? Or ar you going to admit you were bullshitting? Set a good example to Ann and John.

Oh of course you don't openly say if as you are not that stupid. You use implication as per the post above.

What this does is suggest their MAY be credence due to the possibility he may be a good manager for them - your frequent commenting on the Reid article on a thread which has nothing to do with the topic is very telling. It creates an impression as to which of the two has most credence and suggests the telegraph has the greater stature. Somewhat amusing given the outcome of the recent ethics review and Gilbert's absence in here,

You didn't denounce the article as I'll founded nonsense. You applied the same undermining innuendo deployed by other council stereotypes on the Pressley goes to Huddersfield thread.

You will now make a post about the fact I haven't produced a direct quote.

However, perception is you are not favourable to the CCFC cause. The circumstantial evidence is against you.

You try too hard.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
You would think that a newspaper that is supportive of a local football (or sport in general) team would do its best to play down or ignore specualtion that would in any way unsettle the team.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Oh of course you don't openly say if as you are not that stupid. You use implication as per the post above.

What this does is suggest their MAY be credence due to the possibility he may be a good manager for them - your frequent commenting on the Reid article on a thread which has nothing to do with the topic is very telling. It creates an impression as to which of the two has most credence and suggests the telegraph has the greater stature. Somewhat amusing given the outcome of the recent ethics review and Gilbert's absence in here,

You didn't denounce the article as I'll founded nonsense. You applied the same undermining innuendo deployed by other council stereotypes on the Pressley goes to Huddersfield thread.

You will now make a post about the fact I haven't produced a direct quote.

However, perception is you are not favourable to the CCFC cause. The circumstantial evidence is against you.

You try too hard.

I referred to the story as a " nothing happened today story ". He may be a good manager for a ( meaning any ) championship team, but I hope he finishes the job here. You interpreted that as there may be credence in the non story? I ended my last post with " who knows?". I certainly don't. Strange.

i didn't denounce the article as ill founded nonsense because, as I just said, I certainly don't know. You see that as an undermining innuendo. Strange.

Yes. Here goes: Grendel hasn't posted a direct quote, because, as he knows, there isn't one and he is twisting facts in a way that Mutton would be proud off. Strange.

I keep mentioning that we have no stadium and no stadium site. We have no evidence that building is better then renting and that we should have offered up to the building guesstimate of Tim, for both shares and the YB loan - if ownership of the stadium is essential to CCFC's survival. You count that as unfavourable to the CCFC cause. Strange.

you are strange.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
I know the rules. No criticism of:

CCC
CT
Wasps

Open season on:

CCFC
SISU
Les Reid

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

So why is it open season against CCFC?
Oh I forgot if you hate the owners or don't agree with everything Les has said you hate City well your true colours have come out.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Yep, Sky blue.

So why is it open season against CCFC?
Oh I forgot if you hate the owners or don't agree with everything Les has said you hate City well your true colours have come out.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Black and yellow for you it seems.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Why is it on the CT site not a single article about the team has comments in double figures yet the one about TM has 20 and the one about the new stadium 30.

Perception is reality, it all works against the club.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Of course it does, spot on.

As I've said a few times I'm surprised more aren't very concerned with what g he ethics committee papers revealed.

Why is it on the CT site not a single article about the team has comments in double figures yet the one about TM has 20 and the one about the new stadium 30.

Perception is reality, it all works against the club.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Black and yellow for you it seems.

Oh I see because I don't like our owners I must support the Wasps?
Well no wonder they get such big crowds as the majority of City fans still hate them.
Then again we are not true fans because we wouldn't step into that shithole (sixfields) you called home.

PUSB
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Why is it on the CT site not a single article about the team has comments in double figures yet the one about TM has 20 and the one about the new stadium 30.

Perception is reality, it all works against the club.

Well in the paper the article on TM is quite small but there are 2 pages on the City game?
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Black and yellow for you it seems.

How do you always get on to Wasps? This thread is about Fulham and Mowbray- or maybe not. Nowhere are Wasps or their colours mentioned. LAST is a CCFC fan - whether you agree with him on everything or not. That has been confirmed time and time again throughout this saga. Yet, here you go again..Wasps, Wasps, Wasps. Are you trying to keep Wasps in the forefront of discussions?
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
How do you always get on to Wasps? This thread is about Fulham and Mowbray- or maybe not. Nowhere are Wasps or their colours mentioned. LAST is a CCFC fan - whether you agree with him on everything or not. That has been confirmed time and time again throughout this saga. Yet, here you go again..Wasps, Wasps, Wasps. Are you trying to keep Wasps in the forefront of discussions?

Maybe I should go to a wasps game then at least he would have been right once in his life.
Could pick the Leicester game and be a bit of bandwaggoner always wanted to know what it was like to be one;)
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
How do you always get on to Wasps? This thread is about Fulham and Mowbray- or maybe not. Nowhere are Wasps or their colours mentioned. LAST is a CCFC fan - whether you agree with him on everything or not. That has been confirmed time and time again throughout this saga. Yet, here you go again..Wasps, Wasps, Wasps. Are you trying to keep Wasps in the forefront of discussions?

I thought it was about les Reid - or haven't you mentioned him or the coventry observer in this thread?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top