Warwickhunt
Well-Known Member
As the Game was on TV i Think the FA will be looking at the Mceverley Tackle
Mceveleys Tackle (9 Viewers)
- Thread starter Warwickhunt
- Start date
I_Saw_Shaw_Score
Well-Known Member
As the Game was on TV i Think the FA will be looking at the Mceverley Tackle
As he was booked they won't.
georgehudson
Well-Known Member
it would be a pathetic get out by the FA if they do nothing,
& that thing Williamson should be brought to book, smiling at Sheff U players & scowling @ CCFC players throughout, plus continued wrong decisions,
further, that lino should be removed from the FA listings
& that thing Williamson should be brought to book, smiling at Sheff U players & scowling @ CCFC players throughout, plus continued wrong decisions,
further, that lino should be removed from the FA listings
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
It was so blatant & the ref so lenient that it would be tantamount to accepting a miscarriage of justice not to review the incident.
SkyBlueScottie
Well-Known Member
It was an awful tackle, as was the one on JOB. The ref and linesman were very poor yesterday. Its the inconsistency which annoys me, Turner booked for pulling a player back ( player ran across tried to catch Turners legs and then kicked out at another of our players), they had multiple instances of shirt pulling and the ref didnt do anything.
The other player who was booked after challenging Lamieras should have also seen red, especially considering Ricketts was sent off and for 2 normal ( ok the 2nd was high) tackles.
The other player who was booked after challenging Lamieras should have also seen red, especially considering Ricketts was sent off and for 2 normal ( ok the 2nd was high) tackles.
I_Saw_Shaw_Score
Well-Known Member
The worst decision in terms of no excuse to have not got it right was the 'foul' by Vincelot on their bloke at that corner!!?? RV arms were out In front the whole way though the incident WHERE/HOW did the ref see a foul by RV?
CJ_covblaze
Well-Known Member
It would be against the (stupid) rules. Nothing they can do. He was dreadful but I agree the lino was equally incompetent. The ball over the line call was down to him.
sw88
Chief Commentator!
Only thing that would happen if they were to review the challenge again (and they've got to; surely?) is the ref will get a slap on the wrist. As he booked the player, either he or his assistant seen it and deemed it to be a yellow card offence. Only way it would be reviewed with a potential red card decision was if it was missed by everyone and went unnoticed. Wrong, but that's the way it is.
sw88
Chief Commentator!
I offer an apology to Dermot Gallagher (not that he'll see it ) as this talking point was one of the ones included in his sky interview it seems. And he agrees without doubt it was a red card.
Unable to copy and paste the text on my phone but that's essentially what he says
) as this talking point was one of the ones included in his sky interview it seems. And he agrees without doubt it was a red card.Unable to copy and paste the text on my phone but that's essentially what he says
robbiethemole
Well-Known Member
maybe the good thing to come from it is other refs will see it and might be more lenient to us in future (or not)
on the disallowed goal, I can understand the linesman not being able to see if it was in or not...................but there's no fucking way he should have missed the handball leading to it.
at least Mowbray can buid them up again by knowing no other side in the league will be half as dirty as these feckers, I thought Ruben was great, just getting up and carrying on with it, brilliant temperament.
on the disallowed goal, I can understand the linesman not being able to see if it was in or not...................but there's no fucking way he should have missed the handball leading to it.
at least Mowbray can buid them up again by knowing no other side in the league will be half as dirty as these feckers, I thought Ruben was great, just getting up and carrying on with it, brilliant temperament.
MalcSB
Well-Known Member
Strangely, the tackle which was one of the two major talking points of the game, isn't shown on Sky Blue Player Highlights. I am beginning to wonder if they are prohibited from showing controversial incidents. But then again, our "goal" and/or un- spotted handball are shown
SkyblueBazza
Well-Known Member
"We was robbed!"
Let's move on
...onwards & upwards PUSB
Let's move on
...onwards & upwards PUSB
no_loyalty
Well-Known Member
The FA won't do fuck all, they leave it to the referee's discretion, they only get involved when the officials have missed an incident
Nick
Administrator
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Now can somebody answer this,you can appeal a red card but not a yellow what about a red card given for two yellows?
no_loyalty
Well-Known Member
No, you can only appeal a straight red
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
thanks
Nick
Administrator
Silly really, you should be able to appeal anything that causes a suspension.
no_loyalty
Well-Known Member
Yes agree with you Nick, I guess the reason it isn't is because the F.A would receive too many appeals?
Nick
Administrator
st john
Well-Known Member
Shown on Sky
http://www.skysports.com/watch/vide...ue-one/10098915/should-mceveley-have-seen-red
The more I see this the less I am convinced it was just a clumsy challenge
Last edited:
SkyBlue_Bear83
Well-Known Member
I don't think it was intended to injure but its clear there tactic was to rough us up and go in hard on the tackle.
st john
Well-Known Member
I respect your opinion but I can't believe that a professional footballer goes into a tackle at that speed with both sets of studs showing without knowing that a possible outcome could be serious injury to the palyer
D
Deleted member 2477
Guest
He made no attempt to even go over to lamearis and see how he was or apologise. It was clearly intentional by the speed and way he went in with no effort to play the ball. In my opinion having been there utd clearly went out to intimidate and foul us to stop us playing our passing game. You could see the panich when we did run at them and the only way they could stop us was to foul us which the excuse for a ref allowed them to do without punishing them. Does make you wonder given his previous history if he earnt a few extra quid after the game
Grendel
Well-Known Member
The tackle by Shmerkle (can't be bothered to spell correctly) against WBA was far worse.
SkyBlue_Bear83
Well-Known Member
I just think with the adrenaline and emotions of a football match that players don't always think clearly and don't consider the consequences, lots of players decisions in football are split second and so aren't properly thought through. Very rarely does a player make premeditated decision to try and injure a player imo, he probably just thought go in hard and was reckless and out of control with it.
SkyBlueSid
Well-Known Member
Here is the exact text of what Gallagher said on SSN this morning:I offer an apology to Dermot Gallagher (not that he'll see it
Unable to copy and paste the text on my phone but that's essentially what he says
"This is one I can't defend. It's a red card for a few reasons. Intensity, speed he's come at the player, his foot's high and he's scissor tackled him. When you watch that it's hard to defend anything other than a red card."
He also said the handball was a "definite penalty" but said he could not say for definite that what followed was a goal as without goal line technology there was no absolutely conclusive picture.
SkyBlue_Bear83
Well-Known Member
I know you can't be bothered but thats still an awful attempt at spelling it (assuming I am right in who you are referring to), you may as well have just typed gtktgfb
Grendel
Well-Known Member
It's the bald bloke with lots of tattoos and of he'd made contact he'd have took the guys leg off.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Can't believe no one went in his face to tell him what a cowardly wanker he is
Moff
Well-Known Member
Skrtel, and it was shocker of an attempted tackle