Premiership inflation (3 Viewers)

J

Jack Griffin

Guest
Oh my gosh!

sportingintelligence @sportingintel

Why 2016 is the year you really, really, really, really, really don't want to get relegated
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...sh-bonanza-worst-season-relegated-flight.html
CXoeikcWcAAFAo4.jpg

On the bright side, Villa will be shitting on themselves if they get relegated this season.
 

Nick

Administrator
Is that share out between all teams or would the Man Citys get more than Bournemouth?
 

Sumo the Micky Quinn

Well-Known Member
From a previous Post:

How the premier league money was shared for the 2013-14 season;


Each club got £55m, + 1.2m per share for league position. 20th place got 1 share(£1.2m), 19th got 2 shares (£2.4m) 18th get 3 shares (£3.6m) and so on, 1st get 20 shares (£24m), also each club receives £750,000 per TV appearance (with a minimum of £7.5m), as stoke (5 appearances) and a few others were on less than 10.

http://www.tsmplug.com/football/prem...e-prize-money/
NO#TEAMSMERIT MONEYTV MONEY SHARELIVE MATCH FEETOTAL
1Manchester City£24.0m£55m25*£750k=£18.7m £97.7m
2Liverpool£22.8m£55m28*750k=£21.0m£98.8m
3Chelsea£21.6m£55m24*750k=£18.0m£94.6m
4Arsenal£20.4m£55m25*750k=£18.7m£93.4m
5Everton£19.2m£55m16*750k=£12.0m£86.2m
6Tottenham£18.0m£55m23*750k=£17.3m£90.3m
7Manchester United£16.8m£55m25*750k=£18.7m£90.5m
8Southampton£15.6m£55m£7.5m (10 matches)£78.5m
9Newcastle United£14.4m£55m14*750k=£10.5m£79.5m
10Stoke City£13.2m£55m£7.5m (5 matches)£75.7m
11Crystal Palace£12.0m£55m£7.5m (10matches)£74.5m
12West Ham United£10.8m£55m15*750k=£11.3m£77.1m
13Swansea City£9.6m£55m13*750k=£9.7m£74.3m
14Sunderland£8.4m£55m13*750k=£9.7m£73.1m
15Aston Villa£7.2m£55m15*750k=£11.3m£73.5m
16Hull City£6.0m£55m£7.5m (9 matches)£68.5m
17West Brom£4.8m£55m£7.5m (8 matches)£67.3m
18Norwich City£3.6m£55m£7.5m (9 matches)£66.1m
19Fulham£2.4m£55m£7.5m (7 matches)£64.9m
20Cardiff City£1.2m£55m£7.5m (7 matches)£63.7m
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
Would be interesting to see the increase in sky subs along the same time.
 

SkyBlueZack

Well-Known Member
Imagine what we could do with 55m!

Or 63.7 million. Looks like most teams had minimum of 7 live matches. Crazy how you can be the worst in your league and still walk away with that much. If and it's a big if, we got to the Premiership, we would be made. Only problem is there would be pressure to spend, spend and spend some more.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
Or 63.7 million. Looks like most teams had minimum of 7 live matches. Crazy how you can be the worst in your league and still walk away with that much. If and it's a big if, we got to the Premiership, we would be made. Only problem is there would be pressure to spend, spend and spend some more.


So it should be spent that's why sky give them the money not to pay off owners debts and have expensive fish tanks. The ridiculous parachute payments shouldn't be paid to teams who haven't spent when they went up.
 

mechaishida

Well-Known Member
That's some serious cash...Jesus.

How the hell teams outside the top flight survive, I don't know. Is there a revenue table for L1 at all?
 

oakey

Well-Known Member
As founder members of the premier league why didn't someone have the nous to negotiate 1 or 2 or 3 per cent of income in perpetuity? CCFC would now be very rich.
 

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
But you are just looking an income! What about the expense needed to maintain your position in the Premier League. It many cases it easily absorbs all of the income.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
As founder members of the premier league why didn't someone have the nous to negotiate 1 or 2 or 3 per cent of income in perpetuity? CCFC would now be very rich.

Or when we were heading down sack Strachan and bring in somebody who didn't pick Paul Telfer.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top