Astute
Well-Known Member
Just looking for another stupid argument I see. I have made several points on why I think this way. You have not made a point against any of them. And you admit that you have argued in the past over SISU not because of your beliefs but because of fairness? Whereas I look at what is going on or what has happened. No reason to have a go at SISU for anything here. But you say because they are a hedge fund that I shouldn't think any good.I must say I find this all rather bizarre. After years of defending SISU against many including you (not because they deserved it but purely in the interests of fairness) I now find myself trying to counter your equally rabid love for them!
You are the one who has claimed that TM has full say on the 'rumored' 60% so the onus is on you to prove to provide evidence, not me.
Yes his budget has gone up with attendances... great, I have not claimed otherwise.
As for the hedge fund comments... are they no longer one since TM's arrival???? As I say, you are very naive.
SISU 'have it in their own hands' Back TM and they could get to where they need to be. Upset him and he could go. Or more like he would go. And you haven't given your reason for the protracted negotiations on TM's contract.