Port Vale (Away) Match Thread (5 Viewers)

Forums New posts
Nick

Nick

Administrator
Match thread for Port Vale (Away). Discuss Predictions, Tactics and the game!<div style="float:right; text-align:center;"><h2>Port Vale (Away) </h2>
8283-pvfc-crest-rgb144-3188.png

Vale Park
2PM Kick Off
​
</div>
 
ClarkeZ

ClarkeZ

Well-Known Member
Nervy 2-1 win.

I want him to change the shape a bit but I know he wont. Not the team I would choose but I reckon most likely:

----------------RCC

Lorentzon Cargill Ricketts Stokes

---------Stephens Fleck

Rose--------Maddison--------JOB

-------------Armstrong

Subs: Burge, Haynes, Murphy, Tudgay, Henderson, Lameiras, Cole
 
H

Hcut PUSB

New Member
Naa as Mr Bassett said 4-4-2 its the only way to play.

Its Vale away what could go wrong.

C yawl in the Terrace
 
T

tom88

Well-Known Member
win Sunday

----------------RCC

Lorentzon Stephens Ricketts Stokes

---------Rose Fleck

Murphy--------Maddison--------JOB

-------------Armstrong

Subs: Burge, Haynes, Hunt, Cargill, Henderson, Lameiras, Cole
 
Covstu

Covstu

Well-Known Member
Very physical game ahead, our quick players will get kicked and they will stick two men on Armo. Wont be one for the purists... 0-0
 
Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
Murphy shouldn't play. He needs to earn his place back. Give other players a chance who could make a difference and are prepared to work harder for it.
 
Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
But he

Lorentzon Ricketts Stephens Stokes

---------Fleck

Lamerias-----Maddison--------JOB

-------Armstrong - Henderson


Maybe throw Rose in there too at some point.
 
Captain Dart

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
He will almost certainly play both Ramage & Hunt.
 
Nantwich Skyblues

Nantwich Skyblues

Well-Known Member
He wont start Henderson ,he has hardly figured for scunny and by all accounts is carrying plenty of lard!...impact sub i would think
 
M

malkitccfc

Well-Known Member
We'll miss Vincelot. Thought they looked decent at our place on Boxing day, but it was one of the few games we've won recently. 2-0 defeat unfortunately
 
Mcbean

Mcbean

Well-Known Member
Nobody said must win game yet :( so I think I better

oh and Mowbray out

oh and Sisu's fault

PUSB
 
Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
Mcbean said:
Nobody said must win game yet :( so I think I better

oh and Mowbray out

oh and Sisu's fault

PUSB
Click to expand...
We have lowered our expectations so much, I now have this down as a 'must get a shot on target, not get beaten 3-0 game.'

Baby steps and all that!
 
stupot07

stupot07

Well-Known Member
10- 0 win to city. Anything less than you're accused of being negative.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 
Fergusons_Beard

Fergusons_Beard

Well-Known Member
Can anyone explain why the fook it's on a Sunday?

(Sorry if been posted a million times)


In went in off Ferguson's beard....
 
Mcbean

Mcbean

Well-Known Member
Otis said:
We have lowered our expectations so much, I now have this down as a 'must get a shot on target, not get beaten 3-0 game.'

Baby steps and all that!
Click to expand...


I think that could be allowed as a variation to the usual record !
 
hill83

hill83

Well-Known Member
stupot07 said:
10- 0 win to city. Anything less than you're accused of being negative.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
Click to expand...

You are so negative. You even assume you are going to make a grammatical error or spelling mistake before you actually do.
 
torchomatic

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
I can actually see us doing alright on Sunday.



Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
 
Gazolba

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
I was going to forecast a win or draw on Sunday but now I fear with all these new players coming in, we'll be a disorganized mess. We could potentially feature five new/newish players (Lorentzen, Rose, Cargill, Stephens and Henderson) so difficult to foresee how they will all meld together.
 
Gazolba

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
Otis said:
We have lowered our expectations so much, I now have this down as a 'must get a shot on target, not get beaten 3-0 game.'

Baby steps and all that!
Click to expand...

I see it as being a different 'must' for each player. E.g. Rcc - must not screw up again, Lorentzen - must learn English so I know what TM is saying, Cole - must try to last 90 minutes, Maddison - must get a new hairstyle, Murphy - must try to look more like I'm trying, Armstrong - must get a goal or at least a shot on target, MAF - must get on the pitch, Tudgay - must find a new club, TM hates me.
 
stupot07

stupot07

Well-Known Member
hill83 said:
You are so negative. You even assume you are going to make a grammatical error or spelling mistake before you actually do.
Click to expand...

To be fair, my assumptions are usually right when it comes to making grammatical errors or spellings mistakes- I'd even made one in the post you'd quoted and replied to.....Luckily the grammar police haven't been seen on here for a while.

Glass-Door-Fail-02.gif


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 
Last edited:
letsallsingtogether

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Hopefully a win with all the other results going our way.
 
brez

brez

Well-Known Member
Could well be called off. Couple of games off allready today and the forecast isn't to good, not a great pitch at vale.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)
Top