Then the 2 year plan had to be a lie.
Yeah that was kind of my point.
Then the 2 year plan had to be a lie.
Otis, out of those 20 + loanees would you keep IF we had a miracle and got promoted?
Otis, out of those 20 + loanees would you keep IF we had a miracle and got promoted?
On the proviso that it was down to us and not the player?Otis, out of those 20 + loanees would you keep IF we had a miracle and got promoted?
<snip> Praying that we invest the Maddison fee in transfers rather than more loans though.
Any sensible two year plan is a two year rolling plan, which you assess every 12 months going into the next two years.
What you don't do is knee jerk after 8 months at the first sign at a dip in form after your back four has been decimated; yet you are still in the top five when the previous season you were relegation candidates.
Who has knee jerked?
Samo there is a Mowbrey out thread, come on you are more a breast of things on here than that.
Oh right yeah... I thought you meant Mowbray!
That's him!
No, he is saying the fans I believe.
I think perhaps I haven't made my stance clear. I did sort of mention in my posts, that it's not necessarily the fact it is 20 players out of contract, it is about having the key personnel in the core roles to build on.Any sensible two year plan is a two year rolling plan, which you assess every 12 months going into the next two years.
What you don't do is knee jerk after 8 months at the first sign at a dip in form after your back four has been decimated; yet you are still in the top five when the previous season you were relegation candidates.
I wish he'd just fucking say so then, Jesus.
I see Paddy Madden is out of contract in the summer. The sort of striker we would want here perhaps?
RCC is worth building around. Fleck despite the predictions isn't out the door yet. Vincelot, Stokes Lamieras .and Rose good acquisitions. I think Murphy might be available in the summer.....the striker is a problem but George Thomas and theother guy might develop.I think perhaps I haven't made my stance clear. I did sort of mention in my posts, that it's not necessarily the fact it is 20 players out of contract, it is about having the key personnel in the core roles to build on.
What we need to be in place ideally is a good keeper, a solid centre back, midfield playmaker and a goalscorer. You then try and build around that.
If we still had Fleck for next season and Armstrong up front, I would not be at all so worried about all the others out of contract.
Think all teams look for that spine, keeper, centre back, midfield general, goalscorer.
I see Paddy Madden is out of contract in the summer. The sort of striker we would want here perhaps?
No Samo I made it clear it was fans with a Mowbrey out thread, you pick up on a typo and say Mobray then you try and twist it into I am blaming Mowbray for knee jerking?
I will spell it out S L O W L E Y the manager needs time, the fans should not K N E E J E R K
I'm sure there is the option of a second year with Stokes. Although it could be a negotiation clause like we had with Reda... Which basically meant nothing.
Martin, Stokes, JOB, Lawton. Ricketts, , Kelly-Evans twins,, Fleck,, Henderson, Lorentzson, Sambou.
How much did we pay for vincelot.
I thinking more if you sell someone for 2 million their replacement might cost 10-20% of that. Especially if the club is self funded prior to that sale.
Most of hose out of contract players will good to clear out.
New contracts for Fleck, Martin, Stokes and the Dudley brothers.
Although I don't think Fleck will sign a new contract if we are not promoted.
I believe most of these players are now eligible to start pre-contract negotiations with any other club.
Only with clubs not in England
Are you sure about that? I know what the FA rules say, but the Bosman rule is an EU law so would cover England too.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors