steve82
Well-Known Member
Didn't go to Wigan so can only go on what I've read here and reports from the game. 1st half believe we started 433, then switched to 4231 in second half. If reports are right then we enjoyed more success with the 433, than our original 4231. Anyone at Wigan game confirm this?
Would you like to see us use the 433 more often and next year with this being our main shape? This would maybe accommodate Gadzhev, vincelot and Rose together. 3 physical players with a bit of bite and a engine.
Or would you prefer natural wide players and a 442 big man little man combo that can cope with league 1 pitches in winter.
The 4231 worked when everyone was firing, movement was quick and slick. When the front 4 went off the boil that left us more often or not with 6 players camped in our own half with nothing to pass to and get in behind there fullbacks. Or teams compressed us so deep we could not open them up with sideways passing and static forward players.
Sensible discussion please
Would you like to see us use the 433 more often and next year with this being our main shape? This would maybe accommodate Gadzhev, vincelot and Rose together. 3 physical players with a bit of bite and a engine.
Or would you prefer natural wide players and a 442 big man little man combo that can cope with league 1 pitches in winter.
The 4231 worked when everyone was firing, movement was quick and slick. When the front 4 went off the boil that left us more often or not with 6 players camped in our own half with nothing to pass to and get in behind there fullbacks. Or teams compressed us so deep we could not open them up with sideways passing and static forward players.
Sensible discussion please