League one transfers news/talk (13 Viewers)
- Thread starter steve82
- Start date
COVKIDSNEVERQUIT
Well-Known Member
That's a shame SISU won't spend that much on player's, he would have been a good replacement for Adam Armstrong .
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
That's a shame SISU won't spend that much on player's, he would have been a good replacement for Adam Armstrong .
We did actually offer him a deal last year and he turned us down so you cant really blame SISU for that
Skyblueweeman
Well-Known Member
Yeah but that doesn't fit the agenda LG. Do keep up.
COVKIDSNEVERQUIT
Well-Known Member
That's Because Swindon offered him more money than SISU !!! :banghead:
mark82
Super Moderator
Is that a fact?
skybluegod
Well-Known Member
No Swindon offered more than TM as TM was in charge of the budget.
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
So we should offer all the players were after whatever they want? Paying over the odds has never done us any harm before has it....
COVKIDSNEVERQUIT
Well-Known Member
TM maybe in charge of the budget but SISU, CCFC set the budget !!! :banghead:
skybluegod
Well-Known Member
Yes but clearly, we could have afforded Ajose given the amount of signings we made after being linked to Ajose, however clearly TM didn't think he was worth as much as he wanted.
Wasn't it something to do with paying off his Leeds contract and we weren't prepared to do it?
skybluegod
Well-Known Member
Rings a bell, thing you are right...we were able too, but it would have represented a huge chunk over our budget, which obviously TM didn't think was worth it.
COVKIDSNEVERQUIT
Well-Known Member
No we shouldn't offer player's what they want, I'm just saying that Swindon payed more than CCFC and got one of the best striker's in Div one !!!
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
So what are you saying then? we should only offer a lot of money to the good players? If only Mowbray had thought of only signing the good players, think you're on to a winner there.
COVKIDSNEVERQUIT
Well-Known Member
Then Tony Mowbray got it wrong then, Adam Armstrong and Ajose playing up front for the Sky Blues would have got us promoted to the Championship, In my opinion .
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
We certainly would have had some goals for column with those two up front, probably would have been even worse at the back though. It could possibly have been a bad decision by Mowbray but blaming SISU for anything and everything takes away our objectivity and allows us to be shafted even more
COVKIDSNEVERQUIT
Well-Known Member
Shafted by Who ?
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
Take your pick!
COVKIDSNEVERQUIT
Well-Known Member
OK I understand , the whole F**KING LOT OF THEM :banghead:
Last edited:
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
hole fucking haha
skybluegod
Well-Known Member
How do you know that? If we had signed Ajose, it would have cost most likely around 500- 600k. Because this is the deal leeds wanted:
Leeds had wanted the club to cover the cost of paying up his two-year contract, where he was earning three to four times more than the average City player, with the player also looking for a decent settlement on the remainder of his deal.
Considering this was on deadline day, this would most likely have been all of the remaining budget. So judging by that we would not have been able to sign any of: Turner, Stephens, Cargill, Jones, Kent, Rose, Cole, Bigi or Gadzhev. So I'm glad we didn't spend all our budget on one player, as if we hadn't been able to sign those defenders, we would have been totally and utterly ruined in the second half of the season.
robbiekeane
Well-Known Member
stop worrying about facts. If we miss out on a player it's because our owners are the worst every and no matter what they should let no figure stand in the way of securing only the best services for our club. You know, "invest"
That said, if they do that and we end up getting said player, it's thanks to TM cause he's in charge of the budget.
lifeskyblue
Well-Known Member
Nick
Administrator
Yeah that would be a bargain considering we got a lot more for Maddison.
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
The budget is set by the club's income
SkyBlueZack
Well-Known Member
Once SISU have taken out their management fees and money for court cases.....
skyblueinBaku
Well-Known Member
I thought that the management fees were just added to debt and not actually taken out.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
No management fees is the movement of money between the ccfc related accounts. There is however, acrued interest. But thats not been paid out.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
skyblueinBaku
Well-Known Member
Oh, I see. I'm easily confused! But if money is moved between CCFC accounts, where is the interest generated?
COVKIDSNEVERQUIT
Well-Known Member
Yes you're right , but the owners can also put money into the club and increase the budget !!!
Management fee doesn't exist since Otium took over. It was a financial tool to move cost between CCFC ltd and CCFC H. The popular myth that is still alive even today is that management fee was money paid to SISU. It never was and it has been proved countless times by OSB.
Interest is charged on the loans from sisu, but not paid out. Just added to the debt. You can ask why the loans command interests if not paid out, but I suppose it will turn up as increased value in SISU's investment portfolio.
steve82
Well-Known Member
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sp...news/league-one-transfer-window-club-11563867
Poor Walsall look like they are seeing the effects of not going up, lost the bulk part of there squad already.
Fleetwood and Shrewsbury made wholesale changes to there squads.
Charlton look to be getting a few steady players in at this level to rebuild after a terrible season with poor owners.
Port vale look like there committing suicide with a mass influx of foreign players... A massive gamble at this level.
Oxford look like they are doing the best business so far, expect a good season from them.
Poor Walsall look like they are seeing the effects of not going up, lost the bulk part of there squad already.
Fleetwood and Shrewsbury made wholesale changes to there squads.
Charlton look to be getting a few steady players in at this level to rebuild after a terrible season with poor owners.
Port vale look like there committing suicide with a mass influx of foreign players... A massive gamble at this level.
Oxford look like they are doing the best business so far, expect a good season from them.
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
They are our worst owners ever.stop worrying about facts. If we miss out on a player it's because our owners are the worst every and no matter what they should let no figure stand in the way of securing only the best services for our club. You know, "invest"
That said, if they do that and we end up getting said player, it's thanks to TM cause he's in charge of the budget.
Now that is a fact.
robbiekeane
Well-Known Member
Yes it is.
But it's not the reason for everything we mess up, and it actually takes away from the credibility of the argument about the genuine things they do wrong, when they get moaned at for things like our second half slump...