This is literally the first time I haev ever seen this claim made. Which senior players? Please link to the Waggott interview where this was mentioned (remember, SW was not at CCFC when AT was fired).
The point is that SISU have form in giving a manager resources, a pre-season run, allow him to build a new squad, and get rid after 4 games (with no losses). Circumstances not the same but the point remains...either AT shouldn't have had the job at all, or he should have been given longer - the ultimate outcome was totally illogical, whichever way you look at, and any defence of SISU is useless because it was indefensible decision-making.
What do you mean waggott wasn't at the club? He was the idiot who offered him a new contract.
Regardless, it was ridiculous that they gave him money then sacked him after 3 draws. Either give him longer or don't give him the chance in the first place.I think Thorn took the season before into consideration, it wasn't based on just the first couple of results.
Rcc saved us a few times.
Tudgay played cm it looked like form.highlights
We only really had 2 good chances. 1 side netting from Dke and 1 blocked from gadzhev I thibk?
A shame to play badly but we didn't lose. I like how harries and ricketts carry Al into midfield. Small positives
Just need to get cm and 2 wide players to make more of an impact
There was a 1 on 1 that he savedRCC didn't have a save to make all game and he nearly cost us flapping at a cross in the first half. Get out his arse will ya.
On the whole, we were fucking dreadful
Hmmmm you don't remember the 1 v 1 then