"Do you think the club will go into administration before the end of the season?"
"The honest way I can answer this is that I don’t think that Abramovich is going to pull out of Chelsea any time soon but if he did they would have a problem – and I’m not trying to be facetious here."
You don't have to try at something that comes naturally, Ken. Another incredibly pointless analogy. There is nothing similar between SISU and Abramovich, aside from both being gangsters who make money out of economic losers.
"The business has been losing between £7-10million a year here and now we’re on the road to recovery. Our players are worth more than they were last year, the average age of the squad has come down to about 23 and we have got a lot more youngsters coming through, so logically, why would they (go into admin)?"
Our players are not worth more than they were last year. Westwood is looking like a 5m+ player, Turner is again looking like a Premiership defender who could fetch 3m+, King is banging goals in for fun for Birmingham and Aron looks to be exactly the kind of midfielder we need, lack, and can't afford. The players in their positions are no way near as valuable: Murphy (0-200k), Cranie/Wood/Cameron (500k tops for any, less for the last 2, and the only one of value is a Bosman in July), Platt-zero value and contract expiring, McDonald-looking close to worthless, Midfield-none as good as Aron, the older ones unsaleable, the younger ones not Championship standard yet. That's without the loss of McIndoe/Carsley/Doyle/Osbourns. Maybe he meant to say "our squad costs a lot less than it did last year"?
The honest answer to this question is, of course, "We will never go into administration as the vast majority of the supposed 30-40m debt is owed to SISU (or whoever the owners are called today). They would then lose that money, so it will not happen".