Rochdale at home Boycott (4 Viewers)

[Sky Blue Kid]

You mean change the record from thinking about something logically to doing something without thinking about it first? Nice one.

NO! change the record from always dissing anything that's Anti-SISU. Give it a fucking rest for fucks sake.

 

---

[Nick]

NO! change the record from always dissing anything that's Anti-SISU. Give it a fucking rest for fucks sake.

Is it dissing or asking a perfectly reasonable question?

 

[Sky Blue Kid]

Is it dissing or asking a perfectly reasonable question?

Do you really need to make yourself look like a SISU arse licker all the time. Coz you are, and haven't changed since I joined the forum in 2012.

 

[oucho]

He's getting worse than Grendel. Tries to deflect every anti-SISU comment by implying the poster is hypocritical, pro-council/Wasps, doesn't know what they're talking about etc. He also sounds miserable when everyone gets enthusiastic about a gesture for all of us to tell SISU what we think of them.

 

[Nick]

Do you really need to make yourself look like a SISU arse licker all the time. Coz you are, and haven't changed since I joined the forum in 2012.

How is it arse licking anybody? It was a perfectly reasonable question about somebodies view.

 

[Nick]

He's getting worse than Grendel. Tries to deflect every anti-SISU comment by implying the poster is hypocritical, pro-council/Wasps, doesn't know what they're talking about etc. He also sounds miserable when everyone gets enthusiastic about a gesture for all of us to tell SISU what we think of them.

So it is deflecting by asking a question about the topic now?

Somebody says it will hurt SISU in the pocket, so I asked have people checked to see how much it hurts SISU compared to how much it hurts CCFC and I am an arse licker?

Makes sense I guess.

 

[oucho]

So it is deflecting by asking a question about the topic now?

Somebody says it will hurt SISU in the pocket, so I asked have people checked to see how much it hurts SISU compared to how much it hurts CCFC and I am an arse licker?

Makes sense I guess.

The whole point is that it does hurt CCFC and therefore encourages SISU to sell, by showing them that their relationship with their customers is beyond repair. From there, a recovery might begin. Short term pain, long term gain, innit.

 

[Nick]

The whole point is that it does hurt CCFC and therefore encourages SISU to sell, by showing them that their relationship with their customers is beyond repair. From there, a recovery might begin. Short term pain, long term gain, innit.

Or it encourages them to cut costs. Depends how you want to look at it.

Then we go back to moaning about the type of signings we get, wage budgets, Mowbray having hands tied etc.

 

[Sky Blue Kid]

How is it arse licking anybody? It was a perfectly reasonable question about somebodies view.

Nick. You jump to their defence every time someone posts an idea of how to deal with SISU(It'll never work being your latest put down) Take a fucking break man. That is if you can get your head out of their arse for 5 minutes. Beleive me mate you really do come across as being pro SISU all the time. You're never slow to slag anyone in opposition to them. Take a leaf out of your own book (Just for balance) and look at all options instead of using your tunnel vision.

 

[Nick]

Nick. You jump to their defence every time someone posts an idea of how to deal with SISU(It'll never work being your latest put down) Take a fucking break man. That is if you can get your head out of their arse for 5 minutes. Beleive me mate you really do come across as being pro SISU all the time. You're never slow to slag anyone in opposition to them. Take a leaf out of your own book (Just for balance) and look at all options instead of using your tunnel vision.

So again, how is my question arse licking anybody? Try to stay on track here a little bit rather than going off on another rant.

If somebody asks me a question about my views or things I post I answer them.

 

[JeffB]

Good game to boycott.........I don't think we have beaten the buggers in our history!

 

[Captain Dart]

t's not about giving SISU money, it's about giving TM money to buy good quality players. If people don't go then you can't blame TM for signing duds as thats all he has the money for.

Even if the budget he has isn't spectacular it should be more than good enough to avoid being bottom don't you think?

 

[Captain Dart]

1000 Sky Blue Sams set off from Cov station to London.

Walk through the busy London streets en masse to SISU HQ as the petition is handed over by St George on a white steed.

That'd get the medias interest.


.... well have you get a better idea?!

Sod St George, Lady Godiva surely!

 

[Grendel]

I think a new owner would have every chance of getting CCC and Wasps etc onside; more than anything else it has been SISU's behaviour which has alienated the other parties to the point that trust has gone and now nobody wants to work with us. New owners would change that scenario.

Any investor knows 2 things: 1) football clubs can be money ptis which they have to buy with their eyes wide open (unlike SISU who admitted not doing their due diligence) and 2) there is the Southampton/Swansea/Bournemouth/Stoke etc model where clubs can succeed with reasonable investment. For that reason, our low price tag makes us a potentially attractive buy.

If you the club signed a long term deal with the Ricoh we'd be stuck with sisu forever.

If anyone with with any wealth wanted this club the last thing they'd want is being dictated to by some poxy rugby club with minuscule wealth that they'd probably have never heard of.

 

[oucho]

If you the club signed a long term deal with the Ricoh we'd be stuck with sisu forever.

If anyone with with any wealth wanted this club the last thing they'd want is being dictated to by some poxy rugby club with minuscule wealth that they'd probably have never heard of.

I don't agree - having a long term home, even as a tenant, would make the club more attractive to potential investors than now, when we're casting round for sites or talking about playing in a shoebox. The Ricoh reflects the ambition that this club should have. Yes, we don't own it, but nevertheless it is a statement of the level the club should be at and is ideal for the PL if/when we get there - once that happens, the PL money will make our tenant status irrelevant.

 

[Nick]

I don't agree - having a long term home, even as a tenant, would make the club more attractive to potential investors than now, when we're casting round for sites or talking about playing in a shoebox. The Ricoh reflects the ambition that this club should have. Yes, we don't own it, but nevertheless it is a statement of the level the club should be at and is ideal for the PL if/when we get there - once that happens, the PL money will make our tenant status irrelevant.

That would be the same situation as before though wouldn't it where a new owner is stuck with a deal that might not want in a place they might not want to be.