How is it talking about the current situation when we're discussing a scenario in which the FL say we can't play outside the boundary of the city and the club abandon all plans to play anywhere in the city other than the Ricoh?
Lets go with your worst case scenario and the cost of the rent causes the club to cease to exist. SISU then take another round of legal action. On what basis are they able to take any action against Wasps? How can any legal case rule over what a private entity is allow to charge another private entity in rent? They could attempt to sue the FL for not allowing the club to move outside the city once again but I can't see how that could possibly have any impact on Wasps?
So you want to have a bet on a scenario that doesn't exist and most likely will never exist?
What the fuck are you on about you plank?
Forget the bit above where you continually go round the fucking houses, you're boring. I now have no fucking clue what point you're trying to bore me to death about.
Right, now as you try the patronising line with me, we'll see if it helps you too. Let me try and make this as simple as possible for you:
You make a comment about Wasps charging us £2 million a year
I say what a ridiculous comment
You say it's not ridiculous (which would imply you believe what you say)
I say lets have a bet, If we go back to renting Ricoh and Wasps charge us £2 miilion or more based on what you said i'll give £100 to charity, If its any less you give £100 to charity. It really is that simple Dave. Do you actually believe what you say or do you talk shit.
Your last line (although judging by your posts you've had a few lines) doesn't make sense unless you've got the wrong end of the stick
Now one last time, do you have the bollocks or even a spine for that matter to actually back up what you say?