Nick
Administrator
Money is good what can I say.I know you represent them
Scg meeting notes from Thursday (8 Viewers)
- Thread starter CovFan
- Start date
skybluebeduff
Well-Known Member
Tries to at least.I know you represent them
skybluebeduff
Well-Known Member
So the some of the Maddsion money has fallen into your pocket, gotchaMoney is good what can I say.
SkyBlueZack
Well-Known Member
It was sarcasm. Aimed at when Gilbert led CCFC fans on to promote his new book. Still I imagine he's a hero of yours.
Skyblueweeman
Well-Known Member
I think he meant 3 weeks...
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
I think he is going to be terribly terribly disappointed. :angelic:
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
Must say I was surprised at that comment. Haven't previous accounts have salaries to directors on them. Why would he take on all this much hassle for no reward?
The only reason I would do that was if my own money was tied up in it. Or I would make a massive bonus if I got the club to breakeven point or promoted.
Last edited:
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
Money is good what can I say.
You've been paid in the last 18 months????
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Or... if this doesn't get sorted out in some way, whether it's his fault or not he's not exactly going to get another job in football, is he?
oucho
Well-Known Member
When did Gilbert lead CCFC fans on? What's your problem with him? Seems alright to me.
Generally Midfield
Well-Known Member
Not sure I understand a word of it. Fisher being typically clear as mud about sisu-ccfc relationship and spouting all the usual bs. trust pretending not to be anti-sisu when they clearly are and then ask for a meeting with seppala to put forward ideas they've spent 2 years planning but for which they haven't got any money - can't really blame her for saying no. the scg chairman sounds like a sisu mouthpiece. whole things seems like a bit of a joke.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
So I assume the trust could set up some regular meetings with Mr Fisher now.
I don't feel that the majority of the SCG members represent my feelings or the feelings of the majority of fans. The trust does and so regular meetings between Mr fisher and the trust would be great.
It's looks like the BPA was discussed for 30 seconds before the side show deflection regarding the trust.
Did the question about going on CWR get answered?
Come SBT board members get meetings arranged ASAP.
I don't feel that the majority of the SCG members represent my feelings or the feelings of the majority of fans. The trust does and so regular meetings between Mr fisher and the trust would be great.
It's looks like the BPA was discussed for 30 seconds before the side show deflection regarding the trust.
Did the question about going on CWR get answered?
Come SBT board members get meetings arranged ASAP.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
FWIW I agree.
Reckon they'd need a bigger venue, with reinforced glass?
But yes, he's openly said he's happy to turn up to Trust open meetings so, they should take advantage of this. Could actually help communication between board and fans, couldn't it.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
Perhaps they should host it in the memorial park and TF could borrow the bullet proof Popemobile?FWIW I agree.
Reckon they'd need a bigger venue, with reinforced glass?
But yes, he's openly said he's happy to turn up to Trust open meetings so, they should take advantage of this. Could actually help communication between board and fans, couldn't it.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
I could make a fortune selling rotten tomatoes at an event like that!
thekidfromstrettoncamp
Well-Known Member
Wherever it is a ducking stool would be a good idea if he told a lie in he would go either he would get very wet or we would learn one hell of a lot
Is TF right that the Trust haven't handed in their accounts for 3 years? If so, that is really unprofessional. As is not marking your letter as 'private and confidential'. Same as an advisor from another EFL director. If you are doing any business with SISU you have to be perfect - look at what happened to others who have dealt with them ( e.g. CCC and Higgs ). Plus, even if you mark the letter as confidential, you can assume it may be read by others, although not commented on.
Plus, the Butts is back at 15000, which implies that maybe Steve is right that this forum is being monitored ( TF seems to be following opinions on here ).
Plus, the Butts is back at 15000, which implies that maybe Steve is right that this forum is being monitored ( TF seems to be following opinions on here ).
colin101
Well-Known Member
Think we could use the old Witches Ducking stool technique for Tim, dunk him and if he doesn't drown he's a Witch (or Warlock) and we don't believe him
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
Also odd one from Mr strange.
When TF was asked when will the legal action stop. We can't get anywhere whilst it's going on.
As a Coventry why would Mr strange defend Joy Seppalla's right to carry on with the legal action.
It was just defeated legal action it was pummelled then three appeal judges agreed with the high court judge.
4 very senior judges said the legal action had no merit.
If the legal action is holding the club back why would anyone as a Cov fan want it to confinue.
Very bizzare
When TF was asked when will the legal action stop. We can't get anywhere whilst it's going on.
As a Coventry why would Mr strange defend Joy Seppalla's right to carry on with the legal action.
It was just defeated legal action it was pummelled then three appeal judges agreed with the high court judge.
4 very senior judges said the legal action had no merit.
If the legal action is holding the club back why would anyone as a Cov fan want it to confinue.
Very bizzare
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
I bet Ched Evans is glad he didn't heed everyone's advice to give up until the truth came out...
thekidfromstrettoncamp
Well-Known Member
Martcov if the forum is being monitored there not taking notice cause their still here
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
I think his solicitors would have told him not to bother. If a high court judge found him guilty then 3 of the most senior judges in the country rejected his appeal saying the first judges decision was right on so many different levels.
thekidfromstrettoncamp
Well-Known Member
I think the big difference is SUSI will not take NO as answer no matter how many times as I believe Ched only appealed once. SUSI do not know the meaning of no unless they are the ones saying it.
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
Probably only does a few hours a week, usually on match days.
Blokes and arse and these minutes prove it. Can't even be bothered to turn up and tell him.
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
He had new evidence. Sisu just keep peddling the same old stuff.
However a few still believe it and keep posting on their behalf.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
I want legal action to reach its conclusion now its been started. DOn't understand why nobody would.
If SISUI are right... we need things out in the wash.
If they're wrong... we need things out in the wash, and if they're wrong it's not like they'll be looking out for us anyway, is it?
It's being used as an excuse for others to distress a failing business in CCFC.
If SISUI are right... we need things out in the wash.
If they're wrong... we need things out in the wash, and if they're wrong it's not like they'll be looking out for us anyway, is it?
It's being used as an excuse for others to distress a failing business in CCFC.
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
Ironic indeed!
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
CCFC will not gain either way.
CCFC are however being prevented from planning their future.
They are toxic to deal with while Sisu continue for years.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
We'd have gained oif Richardson and Robinson hadn't agreed a confidentiality deal...
Moff
Well-Known Member
Ironic coming from you, someone who keeps posting on Wasps behalf.
No one believes what SISU say, its just some read it differently to you. That's life.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
I don't mind them taking the action but once a high putt judge and three of the most senior judges in country. Say what most thought in the first place.
There is no case to answer. They are not saying this is close to call or anything like that. It was an out and out no.
Then when others including TF are saying the legal action is holding us back.
That's when as a Cov fan I am wanting the action to stop.
If the council and Wasos are lying we would soon find out.
Also it saves our owners a waste of time and money
olderskyblue
Well-Known Member
Wow, there are so many things wrong with that meeting. I wonder, as it's supposed to be a discussion about the match day experience, why the chairman didn't stop Tim as he went way outside the "rules of engagement" and then suggest he took this up separately with Steve, but no, he joined in on the attack. Incredible. It deflected away from a lot of other issues though eh?
I do wonder what the finances of the trust has to do with the match-day experience, and really, it might have been prudent for Steve to just tell Tim that he would refer it back to the Trust, as he cannot respond on their behalf now.
It is a bit rich when TF questions you're accounts though, or maybe they're in as much of a "mess" as CCFC's, that when sorted, seemed to have the pieces in different positions, but positions that fitted in perfectly for administration. (Although the trust should have submitted accounts really)
I do wonder what the finances of the trust has to do with the match-day experience, and really, it might have been prudent for Steve to just tell Tim that he would refer it back to the Trust, as he cannot respond on their behalf now.
It is a bit rich when TF questions you're accounts though, or maybe they're in as much of a "mess" as CCFC's, that when sorted, seemed to have the pieces in different positions, but positions that fitted in perfectly for administration. (Although the trust should have submitted accounts really)
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
I find it hard to believe that it hasn't already reached its conclusion given that four judges who have considered all the arguments are in unison with saying no case to answer. Any continuation of legal action seems to be an exercise in measuring how many times SISU have to hear it before they stop.