chiefdave
Well-Known Member
But was there anything significantly different between what the trust released and the final version that had been altered to satisfy SISU?The trust did bring out one set of minutes early.
But was there anything significantly different between what the trust released and the final version that had been altered to satisfy SISU?The trust did bring out one set of minutes early.
But was there anything significantly different between what the trust released and the final version that had been altered to satisfy SISU?
Ah you're right tony I was thinking of some chat re Venus took exception to.There couldn't really be after the trust went out early could there. What were the club going to do? Omit things that the trust had reported and let the cat out of the bag that they're heavily doctored.
Also I remember when this happened and IIRC the trust took some abuse on here for doing so. Which brings me back to my previous point. Is there any scenario where the trust isn't at fault?
It is all the usual bllx of, as you mentioned previously, ego & self interest...dressed up as transparency.As I understand it the SCG has a meeting where detailed minutes are taken, the minutes are then circulated to those are members for approval and amendment, any comment is embargoed until the minutes are published on the CCFC website after approval by those in charge at the club. As I also understand it challenges have been made to contents by the Trust, am guessing causing delays, but it is the club led by TF that has final say as to content.
So before this thread gets derailed and concentrates on deficiencies in the Trust just think about the amount of criticism dished out by the Club and other members of the SCG in its direction and ask how would you deal with it. Hard to be heard with a whole room pointing at you about nonsense that doesn't concern them, targeted deflection. So keep it about the SCG and those that lead that body and its agenda
The SCG was not just down to Paul Fletcher, it was a Trust idea supported by the London Supporters Group, basically it has been hijacked from its original purpose, manipulated, suited to certain purposes and egos and totally devalued
You're right it should be about the match day stuff. The match day experience well let me tell you about my match day experience yesterday it was shite same as a lot of the games this season. The match day experience is not just about how the jsbs are treated or whether they have a party admirable as they are and fair play to Pat Raybould. It's not all about pricing of food and srink car parking etc. It's about how you as a fan feel about your experience on match day. It's about what the fans feel they've got out of the match.Because it's a power thing. The trust are going on and on about fan ownership and they are all in a battle to Willy wave about a pointless thing anyway that makes no difference. I wouldn't be surprised if people on there make their own business cards and introduce themselves as their scg title. It's the same as the multiple fans groups.
It should be about people like pat from the jsbs and the match day stuff.
You're right it should be about the match day stuff. The match day experience well let me tell you about my match day experience yesterday it was shite same as a lot of the games this season. The match day experience is not just about how the jsbs are treated or whether they have a party admirable as they are and fair play to Pat Raybould. It's not all about pricing of food and srink car parking etc. It's about how you as a fan feel about your experience on match day. It's about what the fans feel they've got out of the match.
The SCG was supposed to be a conduit to the club to raise fans concerns about the club so presumably most of the members of the SCG have no concerns and their match day experience this season have be great. I suggest they ask the majority of the fans what their matchday experiences have been.
While people are there shouting over and over about the manager's budget and completely missing the point then nothing is going to get sorted about the matchday is it? The same as some sort of wrestling over who has the most power and who can sit on the spinny chair and shit like that. That's why I say leave it to the people like Pat and fuck everybody else off if they want power, they get a cup of tea and a biscuit. None of this pathetic chair stuff, it's like kids and their gangs.
I only use the JSB stuff as it's the only person I actually know of on there who does stuff in regards to match day, that's not to say there isn't [/QUOTE
It should be about questioning the club i.e. What is happening about Ryton? What's happening about the academy? What's happening about where we're going to play? What's happening about a manager? Why when we're in the shit are the club so quiet? How much do SISU want to go? What are the club going to do to actually give the fans a matchday experience.
But JSBs is only for a small percentage of the fanbase and who sadly 70 percent will stop going when they are old enough.While people are there shouting over and over about the manager's budget and completely missing the point then nothing is going to get sorted about the matchday is it? The same as some sort of wrestling over who has the most power and who can sit on the spinny chair and shit like that. That's why I say leave it to the people like Pat and fuck everybody else off if they want power, they get a cup of tea and a biscuit. None of this pathetic chair stuff, it's like kids and their gangs.
I only use the JSB stuff as it's the only person I actually know of on there who does stuff in regards to match day, that's not to say there isn't
But JSBs is only for a small percentage of the fanbase and who sadly 70 percent will stop going when they are old enough.
I know I used to take 4 every home game for over 5 seasons sadly none go now
No I know, that was just the one example I knew of. I don't know who most of the other people are on there to comment about who they represent.
I just think it needs to either be sacked off or sorted out. Nobody takes it seriously so probably wouldn't be a great loss. needs to cut out all of the power stuff, let's face it with all honesty that there is no power in the SCG. You can't impress people away from CCFC by mentioning it.*
*By you, I mean a you as in people there rather than you individually.
So everyone should stop trying to help the situation because SISU are censoring what we hear?Then why continue attending? Why not refuse to attend on the basis that people are receiving emails if challenging TF/SISU. Refuse to attend on the basis the minutes are not a true and accurate reflection of the meeting?
Let's be honest, the trust wouldn't lose/miss out on anything. Nobody respects the SCG or thinks its fit for purpose. Why not out it?
No one gives a toss about the SCG and they are s laughing stock. To my knowledge though they haven't;
Rolled out the red carpet for some rugby wankers from London
Praised the council at every opportunity
Rubbished the football club at every opportunity
Still you used to slober and drool over that tosser Gilbert when he used to post on here. No doubt you were also one of the clowns who fawned over the odious PWKH (only my opinion you are odious PWKH)
Bore off and go back to the DIY there's a good chap.
I was wondering where that teddy came fromOoooer
Past someone's bedtime.