skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
No lie. You're definitely to dumb to work it out for yourself.
SISU/Otium (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter weecohawena
- Start date
No lie. You're definitely to dumb to work it out for yourself.
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Mmmm...maybe so.
Brylowes
Well-Known Member
Surely it would be more far-fetched to believe there weren't
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Exactly. From all sides.
Especially when one let slip details from an SCG meeting not that long ago before they were published. In fact they pretty much quoted something that TF said word for word from the published minutes before they went up on the clubs site the very next day. And before grendull starts no it wasn't someone from the trust.
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Maybe so. There are a few on both sides who are a little OTT.
Brylowes
Well-Known Member
In this day and age they wouldn't be doing their jobs if they weren't keeping an eye
On social media, but while keeping an eye" why not try too steer opinions one way
Or the other,
Brylowes
Well-Known Member
I think they would be the type who watch a lot, but post little just popping up now and then
On the more political threads, I think Rfc could be undercover for the Special Branch.
He's definitely special that one.
Moff
Well-Known Member
I think they would be the type who watch a lot, but post little just popping up now and then
On the more political threads, I think Rfc could be undercover for the Special Branch.
He's definitely special that one.
Special Branch wouldn't stand out like a sore thumb, so that rules RFC out.
Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
Awwww come on Grendel woo knows woo made a ickle bickle bowwock don't woo
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
The team entertained and it was worse than the worse case scenario
Brylowes
Well-Known Member
Yeah but these are the 'really "Special Branch"Special Branch wouldn't stand out like a sore thumb, so that rules RFC out.
Brylowes
Well-Known Member
I know that, but we're talking about what they budgeted for.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
I think they got a shock a budgeted fir far more fans
Grendel
Well-Known Member
They didnt
Grendel
Well-Known Member
No one else can either and you haven't the balls to name one - fair enough
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Who was it anyone? Not Tony as he seems reluctant to name names.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
Think that was oldfiver wasn't it?
I remember when whoever it was posted what they posted. I thought what a really bizzare thing to post and where had that come from.
Then about a week later the meetings came out and it all made sense.
I assume old fiver was at the meeting and agreed with the stance taken by TF. Who seemed very rattled by the idea of the fans asking to meet to discus if they could take over the club.
Last edited:
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Someone else actually picked up on it (not that you would have noticed with your head stuck up your arse like it is) at the time it was posted. The other poster not being a member of the SCG although probably close enough to someone who is that they can get a sneaky peak at the SCG notes. I only picked up on what they were pointing out the next day when the official minutes went up on the clubs site, the penny dropped so I went back and double checked what was originally posted and sure enough it was pretty much word for word to a comment attributed to TF in the SCG note's.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Are you a detective Tony?
Nick
Administrator
Jan wasn't it?
Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
Try doing some research Grenduffy, instead of making the snide "Link" remarks.
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Didn't you want someone to find the Tim Fisher video for you yesterday? Just sayin'.
Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
Only because I couldn't find it.
How many times do you see me ask for links compared to Grenduffy?....Just sayin!
Astute
Well-Known Member
Looking for any type of intelligence some days would be an impossible task. Plenty of idiots though :cyclops:
Nick
Administrator
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
Not quite right is it. Currently they get the net profit split 50:50 which equates to 15% of the turnover. For which they bear no costs at all
Then next breath it is a HR or in New stadium we got 100's of thousands....... yes but you got 100's of thousands of costs too.
Got to compare like with like.
Oh and SCMP is based on net after deduction of direct costs
So what are those OSB because it looks like SCMP is currently 40%of turnover?
SCMP having shrunk by £200 K per an over the last two seasons.
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
The figure for SCMP would be sales less (cost buying the goods for resale and the direct wages) wingy
Of course we now franchise a lot of stuff out so what counts is the share of net profit we have agreed to. ........ that's not the same necessarily as the above definition.
We could've easily got projections wrong and restricted budget further than expected
Of course we now franchise a lot of stuff out so what counts is the share of net profit we have agreed to. ........ that's not the same necessarily as the above definition.
We could've easily got projections wrong and restricted budget further than expected
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
That seems a very low profit margin for this type of thing, even before you consider the prices at the Ricoh are higher than anywhere else.
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
It may be CD but the point is the comparison fisher keeps repeating is misdirection at its finest
To me it looks like we'd have to grow a further £3M of turnover to grow Player budget anywhere close to 60%,so another 20,000 on the gates and a £1M sponsorship deal, or build a ground £25M with a ceiling of of up to 20k fill it every week get said sponsorship and sell gazillion pies every match, then pay for it?
Compass needs to have its (franchise ) loans repaid out of it!