HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
Haven't posted for a while, but thought I'd weigh in with my 2 cents.
had a discussion this morning with a friend, we were discussing how much we enjoyed the protest and whether SISU were aware of it. We then discussed whether it was better than NOPM (as you know I'm against it, my friend is for it)
We moved on to what Fisher said, he stated that the business was breaking even and even making profit. If we look purely at whether SISUs business is affected, are we asking the wrong questions?
No investor is going to look at CCFC and say "you're destroying a community football club" wouldn't SISU use CCFC and say we've turned this business around? And therefore actually look good in the eyes of the investors?
They're shoddy football club owners, but as a business they've turned us around.
All in all I've lost a bit of heart after this, I mean, sounding defeated - are we just doomed as a football club whatever we do?
had a discussion this morning with a friend, we were discussing how much we enjoyed the protest and whether SISU were aware of it. We then discussed whether it was better than NOPM (as you know I'm against it, my friend is for it)
We moved on to what Fisher said, he stated that the business was breaking even and even making profit. If we look purely at whether SISUs business is affected, are we asking the wrong questions?
No investor is going to look at CCFC and say "you're destroying a community football club" wouldn't SISU use CCFC and say we've turned this business around? And therefore actually look good in the eyes of the investors?
They're shoddy football club owners, but as a business they've turned us around.
All in all I've lost a bit of heart after this, I mean, sounding defeated - are we just doomed as a football club whatever we do?