CCFC players visit (29 Viewers)

Moff

Well-Known Member
Not really, I wondered why the other CCFC "stars" weren't able to attend to make the kid's day/xmas.

Then you go on about a tea lady.

FFS lighten up. Some players attended the hospital. A nice touch, and you just moan. Fucking move on.
 

Nick

Administrator
Well it read to me as: Good to see, the players that did visit.

I can see why you mean he's clarifying about Ricketts, but can you not see that the punctuation makes it look like he's saying THE players visiting? As in specifically praising the 3 players that went?

Surely he would have written that then if he was having a dig?

Happy to have a fiver with you and admit I'm wrong ;)
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
FFS lighten up. Some players attended the hospital. A nice touch, and you just moan. Fucking move on.

Right.....

Clearly, the points been lost. So here we go again....

Why didn't the rest of the team visit? If due to Health and Safety in numbers etc, alternative days etc? Why was it left down to 3 players?
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
Surely he would have written that then if he was having a dig?

Happy to have a fiver with you and admit I'm wrong ;)

No, I can see why you've read it like that.

The punctuation makes it read other ways though, wouldn't you agree?
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
Right.....

Clearly, the points been lost. So here we go again....

Why didn't the rest of the team visit? If due to Health and Safety in numbers etc, alternative days etc? Why was it left down to 3 players?

Look like you I don't know. I am just happy they did it.
 

Nick

Administrator
Jesus Christ, and you talk to me about the following posts/replies.

Yes, because you go from making out you can't see how I read something to saying how you can.

Like I said, fiver to the legacy fund, somebody will be wrong and I am always happy to be and apologise?
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
And if you can find a post on this thread where I'm knocking the 3 players that went, then your "moaning" accusations have some body to them.

My interpretation of this thread is different to yours. I know you haven't knocked the three players that went, its the amount of players that attended that I felt you criticised.

I have no wish to continue disagreeing with you on our interpretation, perhaps we should just agree to disagree and leave our conversation at that.
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
Yes, because you go from making out you can't see how I read something to saying how you can.

Like I said, fiver to the legacy fund, somebody will be wrong and I am always happy to be and apologise?

I've already said I see what you mean now, didn't I?

No, I can see why you've read it like that.

The punctuation makes it read other ways though, wouldn't you agree?
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
My interpretation of this thread is different to yours. I know you haven't knocked the three players that went, its the amount of players that attended that I felt you criticised.

I have no wish to continue disagreeing with you on our interpretation, perhaps we should just agree to disagree and leave our conversation at that.

This is exactly what I'm talking about. I don't see the confusion?
 

Nick

Administrator
I've already said I see what you mean now, didn't I?

No, I can see why you've read it like that.

The punctuation makes it read other ways though, wouldn't you agree?
You will read it how you want to, although if he was having a dig he would have made it clear. Not just saying it's good that players visited.

It just looks pretty clear he was clarifying he means it was good about players visiting and not the other thing, which was Ricketts.
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
You will read it how you want to, although if he was having a dig he would have made it clear. Not just saying it's good that players visited.

It just looks pretty clear he was clarifying he means it was good about players visiting and not the other thing, which was Ricketts.

I read it one way, you explained how you read it, I see what you mean now and I've agreed, he meant it another way.

Don't see the need for a dig?
 

I_Saw_Shaw_Score

Well-Known Member
No wonder my ears are burning!

It wasn't in reference to Ricketts being there, glad he's taken time & visited, to be honest there was no need for me to put the brackets bit.

(Thanks all)
 

Nick

Administrator
We both lose and are wrong, fiver to charity also? :)

I'll do it when at the computer, I was the one who brought that bit up so only fair!
 

Nick

Administrator
Could have broken the likes on here by putting SISU out on the certificate and posted it ;)
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
has this been posted, I might have missed it..


Coventry City FC
In previous years the whole squad have visited - this year, the hospital asked that only 5 went, as this has less impact on the day to day running of wards. However, the full squad donated to get their gifts for the wards. PUSB

If so, then fair enough. This seems odd though, why not do several days/different wards etc?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top