clint van damme
Well-Known Member
saved by the edit!!
Cheers working now.saved by the edit!!
Burge
Foley Clarke Willis Haynes/Rawson
Reilly Stevenson
Rose. Reid
Beavon Vernam
Burge
Foley Clarke Willis Haynes/Rawson
Reilly Stevenson
Rose. Reid
Beavon Vernam
I wouldn't play Rose at all, he's shite.Not sure on that formation? TM tried to play a narrow attacking strategy, which in itself didn't work, especially as Reid is very much a winger and nothing else. Equally if it is intended to be Rose/Reid on the wings, I am not a fan of Rose out there. He offers energy but lacks the technical ability or awareness of a winger.
Also not sure on Rawson at LB? Based on his debut he doesn't look particularly comfortable on the ball and I don't see him offering an outlet, or pushing forward. I appreciate it does means a defence consisting of four six footers which should be solid.
Finally, I'd play RCC over Burge. He will be high on confidence after the cup game, and that is something we desperately need.
I like the strikers though!
I wouldn't play Rose at all, he's shite.
Can't believe how quiet this thread is, three hours before kick off.
I wonder if the Wycombe and (hopefully) Wembley threads will be?
What's the team?
Quite attacking! Is Thomas wing back?Burge
Willis Clarke Rawson
Thomas Stevenson Reilly Haynes
Vernam
Tudgay Beavon
Quite attacking! Is Thomas wing back?
Better than being careful I guessLooking at the line up with effectively four strikers, it's almost like he's thought fuck it, might as well have a go from the start
You're not counting Tudgay in that are youLooking at the line up with effectively four strikers, it's almost like he's thought fuck it, might as well have a go from the start
They're all still there, we just have a lot of trouble getting the ball in between them.Where did all those posts go?