Another Paris attack (11 Viewers)
- Thread starter ccfc92
- Start date
SkyblueBazza
Well-Known Member
In what way?
I saw it being reported this morning on BBC1. Saying the perpetrator was on the police 'watch-list' as he was known to have been radicalised.
...onwards & upwards PUSB
I saw it being reported this morning on BBC1. Saying the perpetrator was on the police 'watch-list' as he was known to have been radicalised.
...onwards & upwards PUSB
Houchens Head
Fairly well known member from Malvern
I thought it was also on Sky News this morning? Or is this a new one?
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
Brussels encore?
Could be gas,anything?
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
Could well be, the house is down.
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
Orly airport: Man killed after seizing soldier's gun - BBC News
Posted 32 minutes ago as of 18:10. They just seem to wait longer now before releasing their stories.
That's what I mean by "BBC holding back"
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
SkyblueBazza
Well-Known Member
Ah...you need to buy a radio or TV or check Reuters web page instead then
...onwards & upwards PUSB
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
Sorry, should have clarified. Heard it at work this morning on radio. Came home and at 5pm hardly anything from BBC on Google.
They just seem reluctant to report on potential terror attacks until it's confirmed as terror. (Not a conspiracy theory btw
)It was on major news at Ninish this morning.Sorry, should have clarified. Heard it at work this morning on radio. Came home and at 5pm hardly anything from BBC on Google.
They just seem reluctant to report on potential terror attacks until it's confirmed as terror. (Not a conspiracy theory btw
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
It was on there this morning too...the time is when the story was updated.
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
No, the BBC is lying to you and you can only trust Breitbart
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
Reported as a Terror attack or...?
I'm not saying the BBC don't report anything, I'm just saying they seem to wait until after everyone else reports it is terror, just to clarify. EDIT: or that's just the impression I get
Plus, I trust the BBC more as a source than the Daily Mail etc.
Last edited:
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
Reported as a Terror attack or...?
I'm not saying the BBC don't report anything, I'm just saying they seem to wait until after everyone else reports it is terror, just to clarify. EDIT: or that's just the impression I get
Plus, I trust the BBC more as a source than the Daily Mail etc.
Why would they report it as a terror attack when it had just happened and the motive wasn't known?
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
Because they don't want to be seen as unbiased.
Guaranteed the Daily Mail, Sun etc were all over this, no?
You don't agree. I d argue it all day long from personal experience
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
Agreed. Despite what some sections of the media like to peddle, the majority of British Muslims are integrated within British society.
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
Because they don't want to be seen as unbiased.
Guaranteed the Daily Mail, Sun etc were all over this, no?
...surely it would be irresponsible and misleading to describe something as a terror attack before it has been confirmed? Being biased or unbiased as nothing to do with it.
Earlsdon_Skyblue1
Well-Known Member
The day before this there was a bloke who slit the throats of two people (I think his own family members actually) in broad daylight in quite an affluent neighbourhood in Paris whilst shouting in Arabic.
It got reported by The Local and some righty rags, but didn't make the BBC or any other MSM whatsoever (at least not until yesterday).
It got reported by The Local and some righty rags, but didn't make the BBC or any other MSM whatsoever (at least not until yesterday).
Earlsdon_Skyblue1
Well-Known Member
If a bloke was yelling in arabic whilst he murdered two people in broadgate (his family or not), I would have thought people would want to know about it.
I couldn't really care less if it is a family dispute, it's barbaric. Surely it's more significant the msm choose not to report it over anything else though.
I couldn't really care less if it is a family dispute, it's barbaric. Surely it's more significant the msm choose not to report it over anything else though.
Yep integrated and importantly largely accepted. The same can't be said of France
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
Yes, I'd say that a majority of Immigrants have integrated and that's all good.
But on the other hand, there's a portion which haven't and that causes problems and some people to resent Immigrants.
There's also a percentage of white British people who haven't integrated and act out racist crimes.
It needs all sides to integrate, not just foreigners, to have a happy society. Just my opinion.
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
I thought we were discussing Muslims?
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
I guess, but everyone needs to integrate to get along.
Basically, if people could stop being dicks to each other....
dancers lance
Well-Known Member
Oh come on.....the largest terrorist organisations and the greatest terrorist threat to western society is from daesh and people of that ilk and have a guess what language they speak? have a guess what they shout whilst murdering innocent men, women and children?
If something was shouted in Arabic by a person whilst chopping the heads of people in the street, I think it should be reported as such, being that it is factually correct.
SkyblueBazza
Well-Known Member
You're right...but the BBC try hard to maintain a reasonably neutral/unbiased stance.
They must do a good job too because they are so widely condemned by political people of all shades
...onwards & upwards PUSB
SkyblueBazza
Well-Known Member
What on earth does the guys native tongue have to do with it?
From a shock level...people want to know about it if it's local
...onwards & upwards PUSB