Wadsworths (3 Viewers)

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
There's a power dynamic in sex that makes it different for guys and girls. It's damn hard to get a lad to fuck you if he isn't into it I'd bet. Still, a crime is a crime.

Don't get the issue with the husbands kinks though. Had a mate who did a bit of escorting and he said it was quite a common request. Lots of guys get off on watching their wife with another guy apparently.
 

pastythegreat

Well-Known Member
There's a power dynamic in sex that makes it different for guys and girls. It's damn hard to get a lad to fuck you if he isn't into it I'd bet. Still, a crime is a crime.

Don't get the issue with the husbands kinks though. Had a mate who did a bit of escorting and he said it was quite a common request. Lots of guys get off on watching their wife with another guy apparently.
Really?? Just the thought of my Mrs and another bloke makes my blood boil!! I honestly think I'd flip! I wouldn't be in court on a sexual assault, it'd be GBH or worse!

Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
 

Nick

Administrator
There's a power dynamic in sex that makes it different for guys and girls. It's damn hard to get a lad to fuck you if he isn't into it I'd bet. Still, a crime is a crime.

Don't get the issue with the husbands kinks though. Had a mate who did a bit of escorting and he said it was quite a common request. Lots of guys get off on watching their wife with another guy apparently.

Yeah but that's different to the husband's kink being 14 year old boys in a bush..
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Looks like he's become obsessed, so when she rejected him recently and he went on a course, he suddenly realised he was a "Victim".

Why do you put victim in inverted commas? Laws are made for a reason and that is for protection.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Some of you will have seen the ongoing court case involving the husband-and-wife BBC presenters Tony and Julie Wadsworth, in which they are accused of indecent assault and outraging public decency by having sex in public (they deny all charges).
This case was brought by a number of "men" in their twenties and thirties who were allegedly flashed at and invited to take part in sex acts with Mrs W when they were around 14 years of age.
Hands up who would have given their right bollock to fool around with a 40 year old looker when they were 14?
Anyone? Anyone?
Bueller??
Instead, these guys report them to the police twenty years later!
Unbelievable pussies!

are you a peado?
 

skybluedan

Well-Known Member
Yeah in the eyes of law it's wrong but she is a fit old sort and even at 14 I would of probably let her take a little shit on me or something
 

We'll_live_and_die

Super Moderator
hes saying he encourages underage kids to have sex with older people.

voyeur to peado stuff?
Errm no he's not, he's saying he would've jumped at the chance when he was 14.

What about this from Dan, he must be like a massive peado, cause he'd let her shite on him.

Yeah in the eyes of law it's wrong but she is a fit old sort and even at 14 I would of probably let her take a little shit on me or something

To be fair, fucking a 14 year old is illegal but shitting on someone isn't. That's weird.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
it is really quite simple.

he is calling 14yo boys pussies for reporting to police rather than having underage sex with an adult.

no issue with a 14yo who wants too, but if a 14yo doesnt then in no way should they be called pussies for reporting
 
Last edited:

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Because they having been found guilty? Therefore at the moment there is an alleged victim, not an actual victim.

Oh it's not because you think boys would just want it anyway? When you use inverted commas it would suggest, in that context, a suggestion they are hardly a victim at all - a view you have already expressed I believe?
 

We'll_live_and_die

Super Moderator
Oh it's not because you think boys would just want it anyway? When you use inverted commas it would suggest, in that context, a suggestion they are hardly a victim at all - a view you have already expressed I believe?

No, it's because at the moment he is an alleged victim, innocent until proven guilty and all that matey.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
No, it's because at the moment he is an alleged victim, innocent until proven guilty and all that matey.

Oh I thought you'd said to be a victim they'd have to be from Atherstone or somewhere or other and you "would"

My mistake matey.
 

skybluedan

Well-Known Member
Errm no he's not, he's saying he would've jumped at the chance when he was 14.

What about this from Dan, he must be like a massive peado, cause he'd let her shite on him.



To be fair, fucking a 14 year old is illegal but shitting on someone isn't. That's weird.

I'm the opposite to a peado as I like em old you might call me an oapeado
 

Nick

Administrator
Even stranger, he messages her to meet up again but turns her down.

She says she was at it with her husband and he came in touching himself and she helped him out and he walked off and they didn't speak.

All still seems weird
 
Last edited:

Otis

Well-Known Member
5 years imprisonment each. Sentences handed down today.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top