George Thomas to Leicester? (5 Viewers)

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
Be a good move for him financially but poor football wise, he would be better off going somewhere that he has a chance of getting a game
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I imagine he's a Leicester fan so if they're in I'd expect him to go.

Just hope the tribunal cash doesn't take the piss
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Be a good move for him financially but poor football wise, he would be better off going somewhere that he has a chance of getting a game
He would be a fool not to go if true. He has more than just potential. They would easily find him a year long loan at a club higher than us where he would learn his trade against better players than if he stayed with us. His earnings would multiply. And I would expect him to make their first team in a year or two.
 

no_loyalty

Well-Known Member
As long as we get a decent fee for him and its reinvested into the team, then Leicester are welcome to him.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
He would be a fool not to go if true. He has more than just potential. They would easily find him a year long loan at a club higher than us where he would learn his trade against better players than if he stayed with us. His earnings would multiply. And I would expect him to make their first team in a year or two.


He would need to improve dramatically to get in their first team as he did little in ours for most of the season,I am really not bothered if he stays or goes
 

lifeskyblue

Well-Known Member
Be a good move for him financially but poor football wise, he would be better off going somewhere that he has a chance of getting a game

Absolutely. Might not hear of him again as I don't think he would make a first team appearance in premier league. Might move to a championship side in couple years.
Of course we could sell him to Leicester and loan him back for the season. Win/win for Thomas and ccfc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Garryb80

Well-Known Member
How can we sell him when he is out of contract? All we get is a tribunal fee for a player who has played 1 season in league 1.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
He would need to improve dramatically to get in their first team as he did little in ours for most of the season,I am really not bothered if he stays or goes
He did improve. And he improved the team. He was a diamond in a team of coal towards the end of the season. If we were still in Division three I would say the best thing for him would be to stay. But we are not. He would be playing against the dregs of the football league. He needs more to help him improve.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
We will prob get around £250k
Might not be that much if its based on EPPP formula.

Despite the massive increase in wages, this would be a backwards step in football terms IMO. He will go to Leicester, get farmed out on like an for a few season then released. He'd be better off staying and absolutely owning league two help us get promotion.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
He would be a fool not to go if true. He has more than just potential. They would easily find him a year long loan at a club higher than us where he would learn his trade against better players than if he stayed with us. His earnings would multiply. And I would expect him to make their first team in a year or two.
Yup, that is the level the club is at now. Thanks to SISU.
 

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
Just illustrates the ineptitude of our the bloke running our club toxic Tim Fisher, allowing starlets to go out of contract and reducing any fee by thousands, could even be millions. I wonder if Joy Sepalla realised how much he had cost her company ?
 

Sbarcher

Well-Known Member
Is the tribunal fee a fixed amount or is there any consideration to sell-ons?
 

better days

Well-Known Member
So can we work out what we'd get? Or is it just fixed to screw little clubs?

Until fairly recently bigger clubs could just take kids at the end of their contracts for nothing
At least now there is a formula to stop that
GT is a 100% effort man who scores the occasional nice goal. His Wembley effort will probably be remembered in a similar way to Keith Houchen's as the years go by
Another guy who always gave his all for the team but might not have got into the top sides of his day
 

FRY-CCFC

Well-Known Member
I'll be stunned if a player who didn't score a league one goal till February joins a premier league side.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Seems as well sourced as some of the transfer news we get on here!
We've offered this guy terms. Probably one for the youth team. Currently at Coventry City.
I can't say. Im not an ITK. But I just know this so thought I'd share. Take it or leave it if you want. Been on this site long enough to have made up rumours at some other point in the last 13 years if that's what I was going to do
default_smile.png
 

ceetee

Well-Known Member
Just illustrates the ineptitude of our the bloke running our club toxic Tim Fisher, allowing starlets to go out of contract and reducing any fee by thousands, could even be millions. I wonder if Joy Sepalla realised how much he had cost her company ?
Unfortunately you can't stop players going "out of contract" unless you sell them earlier, for which you have to have a buyer.

You can offer a new contract with better terms, which posters on here seem to think has been done, but you can't make the player sign up to them.

It's not being out of contract that's the problem - all contracts end at some time - it's not being able to offer an attractive proposition
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
lol at people moaning about how we should have signed him up sooner when the general consensus within our fans until around March was that he wasn't good enough for League One

Not me. I'd have every youth player anywhere close to the first team on a contract until they're 23 personally. We shouldn't be waiting until the last minute every time, it's just needless penny pinching. The cash you save in shorter contracts gets eaten up by the loss on transfer fees.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Unfortunately you can't stop players going "out of contract" unless you sell them earlier, for which you have to have a buyer.

You can offer a new contract with better terms, which posters on here seem to think has been done, but you can't make the player sign up to them.

It's not being out of contract that's the problem - all contracts end at some time - it's not being able to offer an attractive proposition

You can offer them a new deal more than a month before their old one runs out though, which is what people are actually complaining about.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
You can offer them a new deal more than a month before their old one runs out though, which is what people are actually complaining about.
I suspect he was offered one before that tbh... or at least conversations would have been had, and suspect with so little time left it would have been as much his decision to run it down as anybody's... and from his POV that's not an unwise gamble, as it turned out.

In a general sense it's true that people were on his back early last season, saying he was a waste of space. We've shown a track record with Stevenson and Harries of actually giving contracts to those we think have a bright future, so if he'd shown better early season, am sure there'd have been movement on a contract (or we'd have flogged him January ;)).

As it stands, we still don't *really* know if the second half of last season is his default position, or an upturn in form... so for that reason, if I were Thomas I'd be going to the best club I could go to. Forget all this nonsense of not getting in the side, anyway. If you have confidence in your ability, and pick the right club, you will if you're good enough. If he's got any sense he'll have a chat to Wilson, who's made good career choices so far.
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
He did improve. And he improved the team. He was a diamond in a team of coal towards the end of the season. If we were still in Division three I would say the best thing for him would be to stay. But we are not. He would be playing against the dregs of the football league. He needs more to help him improve.

Yes - those who don't think George is all that - £12m rated Jacob Murphy being looked at by Newcastle (yet a number of our fans gave him dogs abuse - yes, he frustrated me at times - but we are not always the best judges of young footballers' potential. Even I can see George has potential. Incidentally, I would have thought a PL club might have to pay a bit more than if he ended up at e.g. Blackburn (don't know why I think that, but would have thought any panel would be influenced by the ££££££s floating around in the PL)
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top