It isn't being negative. It is being realistic.If you want to be negative it leave's us open for others to come in if he proves himself, but MR gets paid to make these decision's regarding the budget and players and will be judged by his squads and results.
It isn't being negative. It is being realistic.
I do agree with you. But we all know what will happen if he does well and walks away.I agree, but i wasn't being negative to be fair, i think its the right way to go forward with him. Others will find ways to look at the negative side due to the right he has to walk away .
You may well joke:
Much less of a gamble on him if he has issues with injuries.
Should have done this with Reda Johnson
Perfectly explained, Astute, regarding Dublin.Look at the Dublin fiasco. He was a free agent. They got him to sign a new contract. As soon as he did they tried their best to sell him when he wanted to stay. He chose a local club because he didn't want to move. He got lots of shit for it. He refused to play in a cup tie the day before he was due to leave. Why would he risk a serious injury like he had previously had. He got lots of shit for it and there are still some who hate him for it. And he was one of our best players ever.
Non-contract? That's the sort of deal you'd expect in a sweat shop. What a total disgrace these club owners are. Still, I expect they need the money to finance their ongoing court attack on the City of Coventry.
No wonder they've sold only 400 season tickets. NOPM.
We don't even know if he's any good
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I agree as long as he is offered a contract if all goes well.Last thing we need is An injured player on the books for two years, he gets fit, plays and will get a contract.
So many times we suggest on here a version of a "pay as you play" would be ideal, and in this case, it completely is. Very minimal risk
Don't say this very often but perfectly played by the club.
I agree (as long as he isn't poached if he plays well). Smart move otherwise though.
Well done SISU!
It wouldn't have been SISU. It would have been Robins and Widdrington etc.
I know you sausage.
Just on a Friday afternoon wind up!
I like your style.I was heading down to Earlson to bang some heads in the city arms.
T
Good move for all concerned. Pearson gets opportunity; we get a player who is injury prone. Yes a risk he might walk at any time weighed against he might not be fit to play.
Where is that quote from, Nick? The loonies on the CT comments, I suppose.This one is a belter. It goes from completely mis-understanding the reasoning behind it to just straight up making things up.
oh come on cc4l asking any man to give up racism and alcohol is achievable but to ask a man to give up prostitutes is out of order young man.ok. sort yourself out now young man. no more racism and prostitutes. learn to control your alcohol.
oh and defend well please.
#Chinless! @):- ;I agree (as long as he isn't poached if he plays well). Smart move otherwise though.
Well done SISU!
Or right back.Good signing. I'd like to see him on the bench tomorrow, would be good cover for Willis who has never convinced me he's a centre half.
Just for information-Dublin didn't refuse to play in the cup tie against Luton. It was Aston Villa who were about to sign him didn't want him cup tied.I do agree with you. But we all know what will happen if he does well and walks away.
Look at the Dublin fiasco. He was a free agent. They got him to sign a new contract. As soon as he did they tried their best to sell him when he wanted to stay. He chose a local club because he didn't want to move. He got lots of shit for it. He refused to play in a cup tie the day before he was due to leave. Why would he risk a serious injury like he had previously had. He got lots of shit for it and there are still some who hate him for it. And he was one of our best players ever.
What's more alarming is that you know what Daniel O'Donnell looks like!I guess Tim changed his image after his failed attempt as a Daniel O'Donnell look a like.