Coventry 3-0 Notts County Player Ratings: King Kelly | The Football LabHey look I can accept that we all see things differently but this makes no sense whatever.
(Also what's the link) :happy:
Thanks lads.
I've now read it and....well he's entitled to express an opinion but I think giving a dude a 9 for 20 minutes' work is a bit over the top!
Thanks lads.
I've now read it and....well he's entitled to express an opinion but I think giving a dude a 9 for 20 minutes' work is a bit over the top!
Am I allowed to say he looks like a right smug c**t?
I won't say it if it's too far. I'll just think it.
Am I allowed to say he looks like a right smug c**t?
I won't say it if it's too far. I'll just think it.
He did play well.I read that and was a bit confused. I thought Vincenti was decent and a 4 was very harsh. I saw that he got involved on twitter to defend himself, light heartedly mind, but fair play. He looks like he'll be useful for us this season.
I read that and was a bit confused. I thought Vincenti was decent and a 4 was very harsh. I saw that he got involved on twitter to defend himself, light heartedly mind, but fair play. He looks like he'll be useful for us this season.
Frankly you're just saying what I'm thinking :smuggrin:
Otis I have given you a like for using 'Tumbling' made I larfI am one of Beavon's biggest fans, but I don't think he had that good a game yesterday.
Notts County were very clever with him, constantly nudging him and knocking him out of his stride. Hardly gave him an ounce of space all game.
He did work tremendously hard though, but not a lot went right for him all game. He was constantly tumbling over such was the close attention he was receiving.
He's thinking what I am sayingFrankly you're just saying what I'm thinking :smuggrin:
And I don't see how you can give 9 to a player (Kelly) whose corners were pretty much universally woeful.Thanks lads.
I've now read it and....well he's entitled to express an opinion but I think giving a dude a 9 for 20 minutes' work is a bit over the top!
I do think Vincenti gave the ball away a bit too much for my liking, but other than that he was alright. I stand by my thought that he'll do well for us.
Okay, accept that 'woeful' is a bit too harsh, but they were poor.Kellu played v well in yhr middle and the corners were not woeful at all. Too close to keeper surr but woe ful ks not making it past first man or going over everyone. All kellys corners still made their keeper work
Kellu played v well in yhr middle and the corners were not woeful at all. Too close to keeper surr but woe ful ks not making it past first man or going over everyone. All kellys corners still made their keeper work
Agreed.Think everyones being a bit tough on vicenti, i thought he won most his flick ons and made a good pass for our 1st goal. Hes the polar opposite of jones and we need to understand this. Hes gonna be a great asset for us this season
I think we were really wasteful with corners and dead ball situations yesterday. The corners in particular were practically all floated in and far too close to the keeper. A bit of variation with a few whipped in would have been good to see but apart from that it was a promising solid performance and I especially liked the look of Grimmer who seemed to grow into the game.And I don't see how you can give 9 to a player (Kelly) whose corners were pretty much universally woeful.
Surely that is exactly the same as Vincenti 'kept giving the ball away'
A stack load of wasted corners yesterday from Kelly. That surely has to knock his marks down slightly at least.
Indeed, the same as giving someone a 4 for 90 minutes work.Thanks lads.
I've now read it and....well he's entitled to express an opinion but I think giving a dude a 9 for 20 minutes' work is a bit over the top!
As for O'Brien, I really hope he keeps his place after that. By the end of the second half I wasn't worried at all with the balls into the box, he seemed to catch everything and showed he can punch when needed. I was particularly impressed with the way he judged the flight of that awkward bounce in the box in the first half and came out a couple of times to beat the striker to the ball. I agree we haven't seen too much of his shot stopping but he deserves a chance to show what he's capable of.
Indeed, the same as giving someone a 4 for 90 minutes work.
Again I think Vincenti was one of our best players. I can understand knocking a mark off because of a few wayward passes but the game settled into a long ball rhythm and he was our first outlet, I think he lost 1 header out of about 20 all day, even ones he had no right winning. Those headers went to team mates too. That allows the team time to push up the pitch and restrict the opposition play.
How many times in recent years have we punted the ball up long to a small guy and then seen it come straight back at us, without PV we'd have seen that more yesterday. I can see he's going to be one that divides opinion but, for me, he does the less glamorous stuff to allow the team to function.
.
I will give all the players a 7 except for the ones I give an 8 and a couple of 9's................. Also in the farcical report above by Stevie Wonder why do they keep saying about Jones he is 1 footed FFS most players are and didn't he score the 2nd with his right foot !!!!
Doyle helped us to control the game. He helped keep the players together. Did nothing fancy. Didn't let anyone go past him. Good solid tackles. The enforcer we have been missing for years.What interesting is that McNulty ran around getting headers and buzzing around being a nuisance and so did Doyle.
But Doyle gets marked higher!
Not to say that Doyle didn't play well-him and Liam are very combative & should dominate most midfields.
Vincenti laid off the ball superbly for Jones first goal, had quite a few great touches and won most headers!
McDonald my man of the match-marshalled 2 old Wiley campaigners in Stead and Amiobi really well. (They will score a load in this division).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro