Didn't really get to follow much last night, who's injured? I read Kelly, Stokes, McDonald, Stevenson and Willis in the match thread I think?
If all of those are injured then we don't have a central midfield. I look askance to those who said we didn't need another CM in the squad...
Who was in CM yesterday?
Tickets sold out - Chesterfield sending 200 more (why that few?). Hope it's pay on the gate - their end can hold more than 1200 ?
Who was in CM yesterday?
Maycock
Exactly - not a senior pro. Remember his efforts at Oxford away last season? I still wake up screaming in the night at that one....
Nonetheless, the fact he's our first choice CM after others are out, only reinforces my view that we are a man short in this dept.He played 22 minutes as a sub when we were already 4-0 down? Most of the fans agree last night he had a solid game and so did Robins.
Nonetheless, the fact he's our first choice CM after others are out, only reinforces my view that we are a man short in this dept.
He isn't first choice if he is only going to play behind 4 or 5 others. That's about 5th choice.
The point is that we are a man short in CM. I said we needed 3 seniors, we have three with Kelly, Doyle and Stevenson. IMO we are a man short without a 4th senior as cover/competition for the other three. It's not an unreasonable precaution to have 2 players for each position. We play 2 CMs so need 2 spare, but only have one spare (excluding kids) at present. I don't count Vincenti, Andreu etc as they're cover for other areas of the pitch....if they're being moved to cover CM, who's replacing them in the areas from which you've just moved them?
Not really, both Andreu and Vincenti have both played at CM. If you play them at CM you cover them with players like Duke, McNulty, Jones, Beavon etc or adjust the formation a bit to suit.
It's not as if we are on about sticking Willis or Biamou into centre mid.
There's no point having the fringe players like Shipley and Maycock to not even have them 5th and 6th choice.
I agree to a point. I'm not saying "never pick academy boys" - but they shouldn't be expected to fill in when needed; if they can fight and win a place in the team then all well and good, but they shouldn't be part of our 22 "first team squad".
What I'm saying is that if you move Tony Andreu or Peter Vincenti into CM, then there are fewer options elsewhere. If we are to play 6 players in midfield/attack than we need a senior reserve for each (IMO). The current list reads: Doyle, Kelly, Stevenson, Jones, Andreu, Vincenti, Nazon, Biamou, Thomas, McNulty, Beavon. That's only 11 and thus we are one man short, that man being a CM not a wide man or attacking midfielder.
That's exactly what 5th and 6th choice players are for though, to fill in when required. I could understand if they were our 1st and 2nd choices but they are there for extreme emergencies. Last season people were pinning their hopes on Stevenson saving us from relegation, now he is on the bench and you are suggesting to get somebody else in front of him in the pecking order.
If you were to put Andreu in midfield you would just change the formation slightly to something like a 4-4-2. You could then have Jones / Duck or even Vincenti on the left / right with McNulty / Beavon / Biamou / Thomas up front with Ponticelli on standby.
It's where a decent manager earns their coin in the lower leagues, where they can't have the luxury of hoarding loads of players.
If all of those are injured then we don't have a central midfield. I look askance to those who said we didn't need another CM in the squad...
Askance.. love that word. Well played sir!
I agree to a point. I'm not saying "never pick academy boys" - but they shouldn't be expected to fill in when needed; if they can fight and win a place in the team then all well and good, but they shouldn't be part of our 22 "first team squad".
What I'm saying is that if you move Tony Andreu or Peter Vincenti into CM, then there are fewer options elsewhere. If we are to play 6 players in midfield/attack than we need a senior reserve for each (IMO). The current list reads: Doyle, Kelly, Stevenson, Jones, Andreu, Vincenti, Nazon, Biamou, Thomas, McNulty, Beavon. That's only 11 and thus we are one man short, that man being a CM not a wide man or attacking midfielder.
We don't agree on this. I just think we ought to have someone competing with Kelly, Doyle and Steve (not necessarily at any particular place in the pecking order). I feel like our midfield is a body light, and playing someone out of position as cover won't properly make up for that and will leave us without cover elsewhere. A luxury? Maybe, but that's what I'd prefer to see.
Yes indeed , good mangers will play the right formation with players that are available !Be interesting to see if MR switches to 442 for this one.
Do we know who is unfit for tomorrow? If we can get a list then I'll pick my starting XI now so MR knows who to play....
What I'm saying is that if you move Tony Andreu or Peter Vincenti into CM, then there are fewer options elsewhere. If we are to play 6 players in midfield/attack than we need a senior reserve for each (IMO). The current list reads: Doyle, Kelly, Stevenson, Jones, Andreu, Vincenti, Nazon, Biamou, Thomas, McNulty, Beavon. That's only 11 and thus we are one man short,
Sod it I'm going for it. On what we know I'm gonna speculate on this.
---------------O'Brien--------------
Grimmer---Willis---Hyam---Stokes
--Vincenti--Doyle(c)--Andreu---JJ--
---------Beavon----McNulty--------
Subs: Burge, DKE, Davis, Kelly, Maycock, Nazon, Biamou,