Tom Davis (1 Viewer)

[Otis]

This is indeed disgraceful.

 

---

[larry_david]

Exactly my point Otis. It was clear rhead did that on purpose against a goalie who gets all sorts of protection and nothing was done.

 

[Marty]

I don't think the Davies stamp was all that bad, but I can see him being banned for it.

 

[Otis]

I don't think the Davies stamp was all that bad, but I can see him being banned for it.

Why didn't anyone look at the Rhead incident?

Had they done so he would have been banned for maybe 6 matches.

 

[Nick]

Why didn't anyone look at the Rhead incident?

Had they done so he would have been banned for maybe 6 matches.

Or ameobi...

 

[Grendel]

Why didn't anyone look at the Rhead incident?

Had they done so he would have been banned for maybe 6 matches.

Wasn’t he booked for it?

 

[Otis]

Or ameobi...

Exactly!

Every match now has footage pretty much.

Why did no-one look at Rhead or Ameobi?

 

[Otis]

Wasn’t he booked for it?

Don't think he was, was he.

Might be wrong though.

 

[larry_david]

Just checked He was so that means they can't do anything after I think which is ridiculous in itself

 

[Otis]

Just checked the game. Rhead was booked. Must be for that incident mustn't it?

Definitely should have been sent off for sure.

 

[sylus]

The Sunday Times suggesting he could be banned for Friday second leg as the EFL will use video evidence for the alleged stamping.
Let's hope not as he was immense last
night.

Well it must be true if that rag The Sunday Times say so,he won't be banned

 

[Otis]

Just checked He was so that means they can't do anything after I think which is ridiculous in itself

Another daft rule.

So if someone gouges another player's eyes, but only gets booked, the FL can do nothing?

 

[Mucca Mad Boys]

He shouldn’t be retrospectively banned just because it was a televised game. Richard Duffy said he apologised to him and Davies said it was an accident.

If the EFL or FA want to bring in citing committees in the future to deal with incidents like last night or Rhead’s, then fine, I’m for it. But, to doing in an arbitrary way? I don’t think so.

 

[Marty]

Another daft rule.

So if someone gouges another player's eyes, but only gets booked, the FL can do nothing?

Pritty sure they changed that rule at the start of the season, or maybe that was just the premier league.

 

[Marty]

I'd like to see the challenge on Bayliss again, mid way through the first half where he got clattered from behind. Ref gave a free kick and nothing more, where it looked a defo yellow.

 

[Nick]

I'd like to see the challenge on Bayliss again, mid way through the first half where he got clattered from behind. Ref gave a free kick and nothing more, where it looked a defo yellow.

There is the 2 on Kelly and the 1 on Burge as well where their players went in at chest height.

 

[David O'Day]

It’s a red card

is it fuck you blind twat

 

[Great_Expectations]

I’ve seen it now.

There’s enough doubt around intent, so for that reason surely it cannot be a retrospective ban. Plus if the player involved (Duffy) is not claiming it was intentional surely there is not enough of a case to ban him. But the EFL are clueless fools so who knows.

He’s our best defender by a mile and he’s pivotal against Stead/Ameboi and Rhead if we meet Lincoln next.

 

[Nick]

Did that fat twat matt rhead get retrospectively done for absolutely smashing shrews goalie in the efl trophy final? No. So shut up, move on and let's beat them Fri

Funnily enough, it was the same ref in the checkatrade final

An awful ref can cause things to happen as well. For instance when things are let go it builds up and it usually ends up with somebody getting smashed.

 

[Grendel]

is it fuck you blind twat

You seem angry. Still not getting a Dollar reunion gig?

 

[David O'Day]

You seem angry. Still not getting a Dollar reunion gig?

You seem sad, they barred you from the Devon again?

Also why do you have 2 sofas in your front garden?

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

He shouldn’t be retrospectively banned just because it was a televised game. Richard Duffy said he apologised to him and Davies said it was an accident.

If the EFL or FA want to bring in citing committees in the future to deal with incidents like last night or Rhead’s, then fine, I’m for it. But, to doing in an arbitrary way? I don’t think so.

Bang on yep

 

[Londonccfcfan]

It's not as bad as made out during the game after seeing it.

It's no worse than Doyle being punched in the back of the head against cheltenham or the multiple other things that have gone against us.

It doesn't look as if be puts much weight on it compared to a full on stamp trying to injure.

We have got away with a few tbf. Loved Doylers bite on Dunnes leg at Swindon whike he wss sat on floor. Dunne retaliated and got sent off.

It's all part of the game.

 

[PVA]

Anyone got a link to a video of the incident?

 

[PVA]

While looking for a video of it I came across this...



So maybe he does have a nasty streak in him...

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

Why does he stay down though plonker. Davies was great!!

 

[covcity4life]

Saw highlights and no stamp was shown

Do remmeber watching game at the groubd that mcnukty kept gently stamping on one of the notts players who was down injures. Very odd lol

 

[wingy]

While looking for a video of it I came across this...



So maybe he does have a nasty streak in him...

If that's last night she needs to get the colour sorted ,looked more like a Chelsea kit .

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

I remember it Ameobi is a right one. Pushes and pulls and then falls to the floor dead. Ref did quite well with those

 

[Otis]

While looking for a video of it I came across this...



So maybe he does have a nasty streak in him...

I didn't see that one either on the night.

However, has anyone got video of the County away game where they were committing all sorts of dubious acts.

 

[Grendel]

I didn't see that one either on the night.

However, has anyone got video of the County away game where they were committing all sorts of dubious acts.

It has no relevance

 

[Otis]

It has no relevance

It does in terms of their fans whining. That's what I am focusing on.

 

[Grendel]

It does in terms of their fans whining. That's what I am focusing on.

Well it doesn’t as we’d be whining if it was the other way round - it’s just the way fans are. Also this was a big game and we looked out of it until the decision

 

[David O'Day]

Well it doesn’t as we’d be whining if it was the other way round - it’s just the way fans are. Also this was a big game and we looked out of it until the decision

Grendal in talking bollocks about football shocker.

 

[Otis]

Well it doesn’t as we’d be whining if it was the other way round - it’s just the way fans are. Also this was a big game and we looked out of it until the decision

Pretty sure the game at their place was a big game too. We could have overtook them in the table and pushed for third with a win (plus game in hand).