Esoterica
Well-Known Member
The big call needed to happen before the game. How did Robins expect a team containing 4 centre backs and 4 central midfielders to play last night? It needed a brave selection and he just went for solid and hard to beat again. With Willis going to RB, Shipley needed moving to left back so that we had an outlet from at least one fullback. In the same way Reid needed to start on the left if Vincenti was starting, to add some genuine width and creativity. Give JCH a start before his enthusiasm at re-signing has been completely eroded by 10 x15 minute sub appearances.In fairness I don't think there was a big call he could have made last night. OK, you could argue he ought to have brought Reid on much earlier, but that's about it as far as I can see. The bench presented a very limited set of options. And who knows, perhaps Reid isn't fully fit (which would beg the question why he was brought on in injury time). Perhaps he is putting his trust in his starting XI (minus the sub for JCH) to do the business over 90 minutes. Maybe he reckons showing faith in his starting XI to get the job done over 90 minutes will bear fruit. Maybe that IS the "big call".
Not that I agree with him, just trying to get into his mindset......
Then as the game progresses you've got options. Losing by a goal? Throw Biamou on to go long to. Winning by a goal and want to tighten up then shift Shipley central for Bayliss and bring on Stokes at LB. Winning comfortably? Give some match time to Ponti so McNulty gets a rest, let Barratt work on his match fitness for 30 minutes.
These negative tactics never allow for peripheral players to get some minutes in their legs here and there because we're never comfortable in games. They don't play for weeks and then get thrust into the starting line up - it's part of the reaosn we look so sluggish in the last few weeks.