Ryan Haynes has been sold (10 Viewers)

thekidfromstrettoncamp

Well-Known Member
8 goals in 28 full games is the equivalent of 13 goals in all 46 matches. Not really that poor for a second striker. Not when the first striker's 27 goals would take the total for the two of them to 40 striker goals in total.

And that ignores the hold up skills, commitment and assists Max provided too. (You've guessed, he's one of my favourites!)

My post straight after yours points out that Ponticelli played in quarter of the game Max did if you want to extend his stats to 46 as you have done he would have scored 30 .As for his hold up skills most of the time the ball was headed on in no particular direction hence only 5 assists all season ,commitment if any player does not show that they should not be in the team. I just think as i,ve said before he learnt his game in the first team not his fault
 

Irish Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
My post straight after yours points out that Ponticelli played in quarter of the game Max did if you want to extend his stats to 46 as you have done he would have scored 30 .As for his hold up skills most of the time the ball was headed on in no particular direction hence only 5 assists all season ,commitment if any player does not show that they should not be in the team. I just think as i,ve said before he learnt his game in the first team not his fault
I think if you watched him carefully then you would see that many of the headers he won were to team mates not simply aimlessly nodded on. With regards to Robins playing him, I think he can easily justify this by the goals Biamou contributed by the end of the season. If he had been played in the under 23s would he have been able to produce the spectacular goals that he did or the MoM performance at Notts County in the play offs? I don’t think he would.
 
D

Deleted member 2477

Guest
Thought this thread was about the transfer of ryan heynes but as usual Grendel takes a post off at a tangent to suit his own agenda
 

Winny the Bish

Well-Known Member
I think Haynes should've been loaned out to a League 2 team for the season. Get them to pay his wages, if he became their starter and did well then we'd have known he could've been a suitable backup in L1. If not - then cut ties with him next summer. £50k - the rumoured fee - isn't that much in the grand scheme of things.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
I think Haynes should've been loaned out to a League 2 team for the season. Get them to pay his wages, if he became their starter and did well then we'd have known he could've been a suitable backup in L1. If not - then cut ties with him next summer. £50k - the rumoured fee - isn't that much in the grand scheme of things.
Could be the salary of two players
 

Nick

Administrator
I don't have any issue with him, he wasn't going to fit in so moved on. No malice to him, bound to have a Stormer when we play them.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
He was an awful left back. Defensively suspect and sorry he may of occasionally skined someone but defending should of been his game

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

Magwitch

Well-Known Member
Why all these threads about a now ex-player, he’s moved on as dozens have before him and will do in the future. Let’s just concentrate on those still here.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
As with most things on here, the truth lies somewhere in middle.

I don't think he was crap and by the same token he wasn't nearly good enough for the Championship.

I do though think he just wasn't strong enough to cement that left back place.

His tackling wasn't great and neither was his positional play. He could be good going forwards, but didn't show it nearly enough.

He had a decent cross on him and could shoot, but didn't put enough decent crosses in and didn't score enough goals.

It was the right time for him to move on. I wish him well for the future, but he never lived up to the promise we first had for him.

I do think he will end up League Two or National League.

Good luck to him, but it's time to move on for both club and player now.
 

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
I think if you watched him carefully then you would see that many of the headers he won were to team mates not simply aimlessly nodded on. With regards to Robins playing him, I think he can easily justify this by the goals Biamou contributed by the end of the season. If he had been played in the under 23s would he have been able to produce the spectacular goals that he did or the MoM performance at Notts County in the play offs? I don’t think he would.
He was also asked to play as a deep defensive outlet for two thirds of the season in a team set up to play counter attacking football. When you see where he was winning headers it's on the edge of the centre circle to midway in the oppo's half and normally deeper than their backline. We didn't have a midfielder run beyond the strikers until Bayliss came into the team and with our 2 DMs who was he supposed to assist? You're never going to get many assists playing that role. Someone like Akinfenwa is playing on the last line of the defence and has 2 or 3 players running beyond him everytime the ball is launched in his direction.
 

Skybluefaz

Well-Known Member
He was also asked to play as a deep defensive outlet for two thirds of the season in a team set up to play counter attacking football. When you see where he was winning headers it's on the edge of the centre circle to midway in the oppo's half and normally deeper than their backline. We didn't have a midfielder run beyond the strikers until Bayliss came into the team and with our 2 DMs who was he supposed to assist? You're never going to get many assists playing that role. Someone like Akinfenwa is playing on the last line of the defence and has 2 or 3 players running beyond him everytime the ball is launched in his direction.
Took me way too long to realise the Ryan Haynes thread had turned into another mass debate about the quality of Max Biamou.
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
Ryan Haynes had his moment when he first broke into the first team, it quickly became apparent that he didn't have enough guile about him and was more than suspect for the odd costly error.
If we are to progress we have to move these types of players on, they simply don't have the necessary quality, the DKE twins have also gone for the same reason good luck to them in the future but they aren't our players anymore so I hope they play really crap against us and enjoy the rest of their careers.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Ryan Haynes had his moment when he first broke into the first team, it quickly became apparent that he didn't have enough guile about him and was more than suspect for the odd costly error.
If we are to progress we have to move these types of players on, they simply don't have the necessary quality, the DKE twins have also gone for the same reason good luck to them in the future but they aren't our players anymore so I hope they play really crap against us and enjoy the rest of their careers.
So what you are saying I think is that Ryan Haynes is like a venereal disease...

Acceptable in very small doses.
 
Last edited:

Skybluefaz

Well-Known Member
mass debate? Sure your spelling is correct?
I know some of us like him but that's taking it a bit far
giphy.gif
 

Garryb80

Well-Known Member
By that logic Maddison can call us what he wants because he’s good.

Haynes is clearly a decent bloke who tried his best for the club.

Why be a dick about it?
The post said we should feel guilty for slagging him off. I have no regrets at all. He was, and is, shite. I didnt fawn over him for being local, trying hard or for 1 decent thing he did in his career here. Im not being a dick im being truthful, something many on here cant deal with
 

dazed&confused

Well-Known Member
For all you Ryan Haynes haters out there, I think I should point out that he's the one who's had the last laugh. After all, he's moved from a team that finished sixth in League Two that didn't want him to a team that finished third in League One that do.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top