Please excuse me for joining in your debate again with my opinion, for what it is worth. From a Pompey perspective I would rather keep Chaplin than get Eisa. As someone else has pointed out Chaplin has played at this level whereas Eisa has not. I think if you liked McNulty you will like Chaplin because they are very similar, except Chaplin has more pace and McNulty more experienced. McNulty was good for us but Paul Cook was set on his one up front policy and most of us craved to see the pair of them played together where, I think, they would have caused havoc. Your manager has obviously watched Chaplin and he knows that Chaplin will fit in to your style of play and, as he is so much like McNulty, you wont have to change much. Out of the two, Chaplin or McNulty, I would choose Chaplin as is younger and he has more pace but McNulty does have more experience.