Thats the rub Nick, state what Sisu have done but they lose all credibility when they print nonsense like this. If they cannot be arsed to research where the money will have come from such as other investments dont bother. Lazy journalism as usual.
We have OSB surely other media outlets have the resources to investigate Sisu`s portfolio or is it just easier to join the band wagon.
The problem with this is it actually plays into SISU's hands, makes it easier for them to discredit things which *are* true, and enables them to put doubt in minds when very real criticisms can be raised at them.
That's my issue.
tbf, the whole premise of anti SISU for me has always been that nobody should be in football to make money from it as a business, as an investment - football is a social thing involving people, rather than something that can be discussed across polished boardroom tables where the movement of a decimal point on the stock exchange is paramount rather than the acts of people, and the people are reduced to commodities.
tbf I'd think you can use their results being released as a hook to highlight they're the wrong type of owners for a club (any club)... but that's a distinction from that as opposed to what *is* reported, which allows SISU to spin the 'everyone's against us' line at time when everyone *should* be against them.
Just my opinion, as they say
