Have you seen our throw-ins mate lol
.....oh yes, hence the reference.
Not in my opinion. You can't have a player in the side just for set pieces alone, well not if you want to be a successful organised footballing side. I think he is a luxury player, no better than Lamerias.
Correct you cannot but if you’ve a striker who can win you between 3/5 free kicks a game I’d like to find a way of consistently looking to exploit that or we’re looking at a Doyle/Shipley free kick which can be good but inconsistent or a Doyle chipped ball into the box to which we’ve already established we’re not the biggest side in the league.
You mentioned on another post the possibility of Kelly or Westbrook filling in if Bayliss wasn’t available or played elsewhere... (I’ll keep the posts together for this as it’s all relevant)
Westbrook the assumption at this point could be its a season too soon for him.
Kelly without a doubt has played his best games when MR took the shackles off him and played him as a box to box midfielder notably meadow lane in the 2nd leg of the play offs he was phenomenal, however he too has missed a lot of football now with a broken preseason so is gonna be a bit rusty.
Andreu is still showing signs of that but is improving weekly and has played as a central midfielder while in Scotland so isn’t exclusively a no 10 in a 4231.
Is he worth selecting ahead of Bayliss or Thomas if you play a 442 formation I’m not so sure but if you could you shuffle the pack to accommodate Andreu is a selection headache for MR right now to move forwards
I believe tho he’s still a vital role to the side this season without many natural goal scorers in the set up.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk