I_Saw_Shaw_Score
Well-Known Member
Bloody hero. Well done him.
He’s been named on Facebook as Teil Portlock.
Bloody hero. Well done him.
He’s been named on Facebook as Teil Portlock.
That's easy to say in theory but as anyone who has to do a significant amount of driving for their job will know in practice you wouldn't be in your job long if you turned up and refused to drive."However, it should not be forgotten that with any driver getting behind a wheel it is their personal responsibility to know they are fit to do so and their responsibility to drive appropriately. Chander did not have to work the hours that he chose to do.
Potential corporate manslaughter?WTF, he drove on the pavement at least 100 yds!
Also...
The jury were also told today that Midland Red have also been prosecuted in connection with the incident and the firm has pleaded guilty to offences contrary to the Health and Safety at Work & Act 1974.
Mr Thomas stated that Midland Red has admitted that by permitting Chander to continue driving despite the warnings about his competence and his fatigue, “they exposed both him and the general public to risks to their safety”.
Wonder if our council will do anything to honour him never mind the City..If he's a City fan he should be sorted out
Stagecoach (leam) didn't care a toss how many hours drivers used to work as long as the shifts were covered when i worked there.WTF, he drove on the pavement at least 100 yds!
Also...
The jury were also told today that Midland Red have also been prosecuted in connection with the incident and the firm has pleaded guilty to offences contrary to the Health and Safety at Work & Act 1974.
Mr Thomas stated that Midland Red has admitted that by permitting Chander to continue driving despite the warnings about his competence and his fatigue, “they exposed both him and the general public to risks to their safety”.
This is bang on. I'm a HGV driver. It is illegal for me to work over 60 hours in one week. Why is it different for a bus driver?That's easy to say in theory but as anyone who has to do a significant amount of driving for their job will know in practice you wouldn't be in your job long if you turned up and refused to drive.
The far bigger issue here is that anyone, let alone a pensioner, can legally drive anything, let alone a bus full of members of the public, for over 70 hours a week.
Surely the law will be changed and it needs to happen quickly.
This is bang on. I'm a HGV driver. It is illegal for me to work over 60 hours in one week. Why is it different for a bus driver?
I'm carrying milk. He's carrying people.
I'll add to this that our vehicles are restricted to 56mph and I'm regularly overtaken by coaches doing in excess of 60mph.
Again, I'm carrying milk. They're carrying people.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
No one will be put to the sword though, except the old boy.
(Not sympathising with him)
I guess to the government. As has been mentioned, nothing is covering compensation, just court costs of £7,000.Isnt that pennies to them?
where does the fine go?
I guess to the government. As has been mentioned, nothing is covering compensation, just court costs of £7,000.
Difficult one isn’t it. Sainsbury’s had their store rammed in, people lost their lives and the government benefit for it. Just feels like it’s a stealth tax of some sort!That's the sickening bit really. I know that money won't bring those people back or make it any better but "pay the government loads" and that's that. Put it to charities or somewhere it will make an actual difference.
By the sound of stagecoach have already put into action that no driver should work over retirement age or over a set number of hours.
Whilst I welcome this it is "THE LAW" that needs changing to stop individuals suing the company/companies, (as they state they are working with other companies in the UK follow suit), for wrongful dismissal at a certain age or refusing to allow an individual the opportunity of over time.