Privately, they must have a name who it definitely isn't...A football manager successfully claimed this injunction once having had an affair within a female employee and even arranged a football tour on the country of her birth abd spent he whole tour with her. He was sacked but raised an injunction and no one publicly knows who it is
Hate the guy, so it's refreshing to see this, and I fully expect his knighthood to be rescinded.
But, is anyone else uncomfortable with the fact that someone in the House of Lords (and bearing in mind, some people are there in a hereditary capacity only) can literally override the courts of the UK. The courts and the government are literally meant to be kept separate, and nobody is above the law... So why is this bullshit 'parliamentary privilege' allowed? Could someone, for example, identify the James Bulger killers because it is in the 'public interest'?
And before we go down the rabbit hole, that only the rich are given the benefit of injunctions and NDA's so it's good that 'Sir' Green has been identified (which I do agree with), where does it stop?
can't stand the c**t but agree with what you're saying.
I'm optimistically thinking you're referring to Mr Green there, and not Mr BeefHooked?
Hate the guy, so it's refreshing to see this, and I fully expect his knighthood to be rescinded.
But, is anyone else uncomfortable with the fact that someone in the House of Lords (and bearing in mind, some people are there in a hereditary capacity only) can literally override the courts of the UK. The courts and the government are literally meant to be kept separate, and nobody is above the law... So why is this bullshit 'parliamentary privilege' allowed? Could someone, for example, identify the James Bulger killers because it is in the 'public interest'?
And before we go down the rabbit hole, that only the rich are given the benefit of injunctions and NDA's so it's good that 'Sir' Green has been identified (which I do agree with), where does it stop?