Sir Philip Green named as the businessman in these sexual harassment allegations (2 Viewers)

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Odeous man. Glad its come out, and with all the stories about him in the last year or so it is wholly in the public interest.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

CJ_covblaze

Well-Known Member
What a horrible character. Hope he gets what’s coming.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I’m normally with the law but the problem is it implies a situation and implicates others.

A football manager successfully claimed this injunction once having had an affair within a female employee and even arranged a football tour on the country of her birth abd spent he whole tour with her. He was sacked but raised an injunction and no one publicly knows who it is
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
A football manager successfully claimed this injunction once having had an affair within a female employee and even arranged a football tour on the country of her birth abd spent he whole tour with her. He was sacked but raised an injunction and no one publicly knows who it is
Privately, they must have a name who it definitely isn't...
 

Nick

Administrator
Isn't his daughter being smashed by a mixed race, American criminal? Bet that went down well



(not as well as her! ahahahahahahahahahaahaha)

giphy.gif
 

WhaleOilBeefHooked

Well-Known Member
Hate the guy, so it's refreshing to see this, and I fully expect his knighthood to be rescinded.

But, is anyone else uncomfortable with the fact that someone in the House of Lords (and bearing in mind, some people are there in a hereditary capacity only) can literally override the courts of the UK. The courts and the government are literally meant to be kept separate, and nobody is above the law... So why is this bullshit 'parliamentary privilege' allowed? Could someone, for example, identify the James Bulger killers because it is in the 'public interest'?

And before we go down the rabbit hole, that only the rich are given the benefit of injunctions and NDA's so it's good that 'Sir' Green has been identified (which I do agree with), where does it stop?
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Hate the guy, so it's refreshing to see this, and I fully expect his knighthood to be rescinded.

But, is anyone else uncomfortable with the fact that someone in the House of Lords (and bearing in mind, some people are there in a hereditary capacity only) can literally override the courts of the UK. The courts and the government are literally meant to be kept separate, and nobody is above the law... So why is this bullshit 'parliamentary privilege' allowed? Could someone, for example, identify the James Bulger killers because it is in the 'public interest'?

And before we go down the rabbit hole, that only the rich are given the benefit of injunctions and NDA's so it's good that 'Sir' Green has been identified (which I do agree with), where does it stop?

can't stand the c**t but agree with what you're saying.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
Hate the guy, so it's refreshing to see this, and I fully expect his knighthood to be rescinded.

But, is anyone else uncomfortable with the fact that someone in the House of Lords (and bearing in mind, some people are there in a hereditary capacity only) can literally override the courts of the UK. The courts and the government are literally meant to be kept separate, and nobody is above the law... So why is this bullshit 'parliamentary privilege' allowed? Could someone, for example, identify the James Bulger killers because it is in the 'public interest'?

And before we go down the rabbit hole, that only the rich are given the benefit of injunctions and NDA's so it's good that 'Sir' Green has been identified (which I do agree with), where does it stop?


I would also hope that Hain will use his new found confidence to out some of the politicians and fellow members of the lords who also have NDA’s as this is equally in the public interest.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top